...
首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Research in Medical Sciences >Utility of rapid diagnostic kit tests for diagnosis of suspected dengue fever
【24h】

Utility of rapid diagnostic kit tests for diagnosis of suspected dengue fever

机译:快速诊断试剂盒试验的效用,用于诊断疑似登革热

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: Dengue fever often presents as an undifferentiated febrile illness requiring a laboratory test for identification. Serological tests particularly on rapid kits for the detection of NS1Antigen, IgG and IgM antibodies are the most commonly performed test across the country. Methods: The serum samples of suspected dengue cases were tested by Rapid test kits for assessing all the three parameters as well as by ELISA for NS1 antigen test. The platelet count of the patients was obtained from automated coulter counter. The results thus obtained were analyzed in Excel format. Results: The serum samples from 304 suspected Dengue fever cases were received in the lab, of which 190 samples were positive either by rapid or ELISA and 176 when rapid card test was considered alone Highest seropositivity of dengue cases were observed in the age group of ≥60 years (79.2%) followed by 45-59 years (70.7%). On rapid test, 78 cases were NS1 antigen positive of which 60 cases were positive only for NS1 antigen. When NS1 rapid and ELISA tests when compared, 16 kit negative tests were positive on ELISA while 34 kit positive tests were ELISA negative. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV when only NS1 was considered on rapid test kits when compared with ELISA were 78.9%, 87.8%, 63.8% and 93.8%. 33.5% of serologically positive cases of Dengue had low platelet count on admission while only among negative cases 17.2% had a low platelet. Conclusions: Rapid kits often show variable results thus needing a validation of them from end user. As a positive dengue test result is an essential prerequisite for diagnosis thus it is essential that for serological tests ELISA technique should be used for reporting. Thus, it also mandates more efforts at decentralization of NVBDCP to include both government and non government institutions.
机译:背景:登革热往往是作为一种未分化的发热疾病,需要实验室检验进行鉴定。血清学试验特别是在检测NS1Antigen的快速试剂盒上,IgG和IgM抗体是全国最常见的测试。方法:通过快速试剂盒测试疑似登革病例的血清样本,用于评估所有三种参数以及ELISA,用于NS1抗原试验。患者的血小板计数是从自动化Coulter柜台获得的。以Excel格式分析如此获得的结果。结果:在实验室中收到来自304个可疑登革热病例的血清样本,其中190个样品通过快速或ELISA和176个阳性,当时在≥(≥)的年龄组中观察到登革船案件的最高血清阳性。 60年(79.2%),其次是45-59岁(70.7%)。在快速试验中,78例为NS1抗原阳性,其仅为NS1抗原阳性60例。当NS1快速和ELISA测试相比时,16个套件阴性试验在ELISA上为阳性,而34个试剂率阳性测试是ELISA阴性。当与ELISA相比,仅在快速试验试剂盒上考虑时,敏感性,特异性,PPV和NPV为78.9%,87.8%,63.8%和93.8%。 33.5%的登革热血清阳性病例具有低血小板计数,同时只有17.2%的血小板较低。结论:快速套件经常显示可变结果,从而从最终用户验证它们。作为阳性试验结果是诊断的基本前提条件,因此对于血清学试验至关重要,ELISA技术应用于报告。因此,它还要求提供更多努力的NVBDCP,包括政府和非政府机构。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号