首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Population Data Science >Guidance for researchers wanting to link NHS data using non-consent approaches: a thematic analysis of feedback from the Health Research Authority Confidentiality Advisory Group: A thematic analysis of feedback from the Health Research Authority Confidentiality Advisory Group
【24h】

Guidance for researchers wanting to link NHS data using non-consent approaches: a thematic analysis of feedback from the Health Research Authority Confidentiality Advisory Group: A thematic analysis of feedback from the Health Research Authority Confidentiality Advisory Group

机译:用于使用非同意方法链接NHS数据的研究人员的指导:对健康研究权限的反馈主题分析机密咨询组:卫生研究权限的反馈专题分析机密咨询小组

获取原文
       

摘要

IntroductionThe use of linked data and non-consent methodologies is a rapidly growing area of health research due to the increasing detail, availability and scope of routinely collected electronic health records data. However, gaining the necessary legal and governance approvals to undertake data linkage is a complex process in England.ObjectivesWe reflect on our own experience of establishing lawful basis for data linkage through Section 251 approval, with the intention to build a knowledgebase of practical advice for future applicants.MethodsThematic analysis was conducted on a corpus of Section 251 feedback reports from the NHS Health Research Authority Confidentiality Advisory Group.ResultsFour themes emerged from the feedback. These were: (a) Patient and Public Involvement, (b)~Establishing Rationale, (c) Data maintenance and contingency, and the need to gain (d) Further Permissions from external authorities prior to full approval.ConclusionsSecuring Section 251 approval poses ethical, practical and governance challenges. However, through a comprehensive, planned approach Section 251 approval is possible, enabling researchers to unlock the potential of linked data for the purposes of health research.
机译:介绍联系数据和非同意方法的使用是一种迅速增长的健康研究领域,因为越来越多的细节,可用性和常规收集的电子健康记录数据的可用性和范围。然而,获得必要的法律和治理批准,进行数据联系是英国的复杂过程.BjectiveSwe通过251份批准,反映了我们为数据联系建立合法基础的经验,有意建立未来实际建议的知识库申请人。关于NHS健康研究机构的第251条反馈报告的语料库中的方法分析了机密性咨询组。从反馈中出现了案例的结果。这些是:(a)患者和公众参与,(b)〜建立理由,(c)数据维护和应急情况,以及在全面批准之前从外部当局获得进一步权限的必要性.Conclussecuring第251条批准促销,实践和治理挑战。然而,通过全面的计划方法251批准,使研究人员能够解锁有关健康研究目的的联系数据的潜力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号