首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies >Tablet-Administered Screening Tests for the Detection of Major and Mild Cognitive Disorders – Preliminary Findings of a Comparative Study
【24h】

Tablet-Administered Screening Tests for the Detection of Major and Mild Cognitive Disorders – Preliminary Findings of a Comparative Study

机译:用于检测主要和轻度认知障碍的片剂筛选试验 - 比较研究的初步发现

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Preventative screening of at-risk population is a crucial step in the early detection of dementia. Building alternative and ecologically validated screening tests are challenging. This pilot project attempts a) to assess the effectiveness of a culturally oriented computerized screening test for major neurocognitive disorder (eHAST) b) to compare it with the Greek version of the UCSF Brain Health Assessment (BHA) which is culturally neutral. Our study focused in a) evaluation of eHAST’s discriminant ability between groups of older adults with cognitive concerns (OACC) (n=35) vs older adults with Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) (n=114) and dementia (n=67), and MCI vs dementia in a sample of 216 cases. b) comparison of eHAST’s discriminant ability vs BHA’s in 116 subjects.?? The absence of normative data for both of the tests led to balance the sample regarding age and educational level for the comparisons between groups of OACC vs MCI (n = 56) and MCI vs dementia cases (n = 60). All participants were neuropsychologically assessed, clinically diagnosed. Results showed a) Reliability check (Cronbach's alpha) of eHAST was 0.9 and discriminant analyses in separating groups of OACC vs MCI displayed a correct classification rate of 77.3%, for MCI vs dementia 80.6% and OACC vs dementia 89.1% (cross-validated). b) In OACC vs MCI comparison, BHA’s discriminant ability was 67.3% and eHAST’s was 60.7%. In MCI vs dementia comparison, BHA’s discriminant ability was 77.2% and eHAST’s was 76.7% (cross-validated). These preliminary results of the implementation of eHAST are encouraging as the test presents sufficient discriminant ability between groups of OACC-MCI, MCI-Dementia & OACC- Dementia. Also, performs similar scores to BHA, which is a state-of-the-art screening test. The use of a tablet pc in the assessment of cognitive disorders in the elderly can have a catalytic role in the detection of dementia.
机译:预防性筛查风险群体是早期检测痴呆的关键步骤。建立替代和生态验证的筛选测试是具有挑战性的。该试点项目尝试a)评估主要神经认知疾病(EHAST)B)的文化导向的计算机化筛查试验的有效性,以将其与文本中性的UCSF脑健康评估(BHA)的希腊版本进行比较。我们的研究重点是A)评估eHAST在具有认知问题(OACC)(N = 35)的老年人组之间的判别能力(N = 35)与患有轻度认知障碍(MCI)(n = 114)和痴呆(n = 67)的老年人(n = 67),和MCI对痴呆症在216例样本中。 b)ehast在116个科目中的歧视能力与BHA的比较。??对于两个测试的缺乏导致的标准数据导致了关于年龄和教育水平的样本,以便在OACC VS MCI(n = 56)和MCI与痴呆症病例(n = 60)之间的比较。所有参与者都是神经心理学上评估的,临床诊断。结果表明A)eHAST的可靠性检查(Cronbach的alpha)是0.9,并且判别分析与MCI的分离率为77.3%的正确分类率为77.3%,对于MCI与痴呆80.6%和OACC vs痴呆症89.1%(交叉验证) 。 b)在OACC vs MCI比较中,BHA的判别能力为67.3%,EHAST为60.7%。在MCI与痴呆症比较中,BHA的判别能力为77.2%,EHAST为76.7%(交叉验证)。由于该测试在OACC-MCI,MCI-MEDIA和OACC-痴呆症组之间存在充分的判别能力,因此令人鼓舞的这些初步结果是令人鼓舞的。此外,对BHA进行类似的分数,这是一种最先进的筛选测试。在评估老年人的认知障碍中的使用在对老年人的评估中的使用可以在痴呆症的发现中具有催化作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号