首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease >Modelling the Cost-Effectiveness of Indacaterol/Glycopyrronium versus Salmeterol/Fluticasone Using a Novel Markov Exacerbation-Based Approach
【24h】

Modelling the Cost-Effectiveness of Indacaterol/Glycopyrronium versus Salmeterol/Fluticasone Using a Novel Markov Exacerbation-Based Approach

机译:使用基于新的Markov Exacterbation的方法来模拟吲哚替氏蛋白/甘油酮/甘油酮与Salmeterol / Fluticasone的成本效益

获取原文
           

摘要

Purpose: Exacerbations drive outcomes and costs in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). While patient-level (micro) simulation cost-effectiveness models have been developed that include exacerbations, such models are complex. We developed a novel, exacerbation-based model to assess the cost-effectiveness of indacaterol/glycopyrronium (IND/GLY) versus salmeterol/fluticasone (SFC) in COPD, using a Markov structure as a simplification of a previously validated microsimulation model. Methods: The Markov model included three health states: infrequent or frequent exacerbator (IE or FE; ≤ 1 or ≥ 2 moderate/severe exacerbations in prior 12 months, respectively), or death. The model used data from the FLAME study and was run over a 10-year horizon. Cycle length was 1 year, after which patients remained in the same health state or transitioned to another. Analysis was conducted from a Swedish payer’s perspective (Swedish healthcare costs, converted into Euros), with incremental costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) calculated (discounted 3% annually). Results: At all post-baseline timepoints, IND/GLY was associated with more patients in the IE health state and fewer patients in the FE and dead states relative to SFC. Over a 10-year period, IND/GLY was associated with a cost saving of € 1,887/patient, an incremental benefit of 0.142 QALYs, and an addition of 0.057 life-years, compared with SFC. Conclusion: This Markov model represents a novel cost-effectiveness analysis for COPD, with simpler methodology than prior microsimulation models, while retaining exacerbations as drivers of disease progression. In patients with COPD with a history of exacerbations in the previous year, IND/GLY is a cost-effective treatment option compared with SFC.
机译:目的:加剧慢性阻塞性肺病(COPD)的推动结果和成本。虽然已经开发出患者级(微)仿真成本效益模型,但是包括加剧,这种模型很复杂。我们开发了一种新的基于加剧的模型,以利用Markov结构作为先前验证的微疗模型的简化来评估COPD中嗜酸剂/甘油酮(IND / GLY)与Salmeterol /氟丙酮(SFC)的成本效益。方法:Markov模型包括三个健康状态:罕见或频繁的恶化剂(即Fe或Fe;≤1或≥2例,分别在12个月内)或死亡。该模型使用来自火焰研究的数据,并在10年间地平线上运行。循环长度为1年,之后,患者仍处于相同的健康状态或转移到另一个人。分析是从瑞典付款人的角度进行的(瑞典医疗保健成本转换为欧元),计算的增量成本和质量调整的寿命(QALYS)计算(每年折扣3%)。结果:在所有后基线时期,Ind / Gly与IE健康状态的更多患者和FE和死亡州的患者相对于SFC有关。在10年期间,IND / GLY与€1,887 /患者的成本节省有关,增量益处为0.142qAlys,而且与SFC相比,增加了0.057岁的寿命。结论:该马尔可夫模型代表了一种新的COPD成本效益分析,比现有的微疗模型更简单,同时将加剧作为疾病进展的驱动因素。在患有去年增生病史的COPD患者中,与SFC相比,IND / GLY是一种经济高效的治疗选择。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号