首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Health Professions >Providing care to long-term mechanically ventilated patients in Germany – Current situation and needs for action from the perspective of health professionals / Die Versorgung langzeitbeatmeter Patienten in Deutschland – Aktuelle Situation und Handlungsbedarfe aus der Sicht von Gesundheitsberufsangeh?rigen
【24h】

Providing care to long-term mechanically ventilated patients in Germany – Current situation and needs for action from the perspective of health professionals / Die Versorgung langzeitbeatmeter Patienten in Deutschland – Aktuelle Situation und Handlungsbedarfe aus der Sicht von Gesundheitsberufsangeh?rigen

机译:从卫生专业人员/供应长期有用患者的角度提供德国的长期机械联赛患者的长期机械抄袭患者,从卫生专业人员提供长期有用患者 - 从卫生专业人员的角度来看

获取原文
       

摘要

Background The number of patients depending on long-term invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) has been increasing for several years. Anecdotal reports indicate heterogeneous health structures, opaque patient pathways, nontransparent and sometimes questionable practices in individual areas of care, inadequate quality standards and control mechanisms in Germany. However, there is hardly any empirical data on this topic. Aim To report findings from a qualitative study conducted as part of a complex research project to assess the appropriateness of care provided to IMV patients in Germany. Methods Thirteen semi-structured expert interviews were conducted with 22 health professionals providing care for IMV patients. The data analysis was conducted with MAXQDA according to the framework by Meuser and Nagel. Results Interviewees emphasized similar healthcare deficits. They considered health providers to be nontransparent and influenced by secondary interests. Quality of care is reported to be jeopardized by shortage of trained staff. Warranty of self-determination and participatory decision-making is not a matter of fact. Clarifying issues of sustaining life, quality of life and shaping the end of life is often ignored. The professionals are familiar with the patient pathways, allocation processes and responsibilities described in existing guidelines, but criticize the fact that they are not sufficiently binding. Accordingly, patient pathways are frequently individual results of experience-based, informal networking, and often left to chance. Conclusions The results point to a considerable need for action to reach an appropriate, integrated, patient-centered level of care for long-term IMV patients and ensure its quality.
机译:背景技术根据长期侵入机械通气(IMV)的患者数量已经增加了几年。轶事报告表明,在各个护理领域,不透明的患者途径,非透明度,非透明度,有时可疑的做法,德国的质量标准不足和控制机制。但是,对此主题几乎没有任何经验数据。目的是从作为复杂研究项目的一部分进行的定性研究报告调查结果,以评估德国IMV患者提供的护理的适当性。方法采用三十三个半结构性专家采访,为22例卫生专业人士提供了为IMV患者提供护理。根据MEUSER和NAGEL的框架,使用MAXQDA进行数据分析。结果受访者强调了类似的医疗保健赤字。他们认为健康提供者是非透明的,受次要利益的影响。据报道,训练有素的工作人员短缺据报道护理质量受到损害。自决和参与决策的保证并不是事实。澄清持续生活的问题,生活质量和塑造生命结束通常被忽视。专业人士熟悉现有指导方针中描述的患者途径,分配过程和职责,但批评他们没有足够的约束力。因此,患者途径往往是基于经验,非正式网络的个体结果,通常留给机会。结论结果表明,对长期IMV患者的适当,综合,患者为中心护理水平的相当需要,以确保其质量。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号