首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Engineering Science and Technology >Review of different TCP Variants in Adhoc networks
【24h】

Review of different TCP Variants in Adhoc networks

机译:审查ADHOC网络中不同的TCP变体

获取原文
       

摘要

Mobile Ad-Hoc networks (MANETs) are collection of mobile nodes that dynamically forming a temporary network without pre-existing network infrastructure and communicate with its neighbors to perform peer to peer communication and transmission. Transmission Control Protocol (TCP) provides connection oriented, reliable and end to end mechanism. It tries to control packet losses, which are due to traffic congestion or transmission errors. In this article we present the review and comparison of existing TCP variants: TCP Tahoe, Reno, Lite, New Reno, elective Acknowledgement (Sack), Westwood, Vegas and Forward Acknowledgement (Fack). The behavior of TCP was different depending on the type of TCP variants because of improper activation or missing of congestion control algorithms such as Slow Start, Congestion Avoidance, Fast Retransmission, Fast Recovery, Retransmission, Congestion Control and Selective Acknowledgement mechanism. This analysis is necessary to be aware of which TCP implementation is better for a specific scenario, where from an appropriate one will be selected. This paper covers all the variants and its algorithms to observe their nature regarding to their features.
机译:移动ad-hoc网络(MANET)是移动节点的集合,用于在没有预先存在的网络基础架构的情况下动态地形成临时网络,并与其邻居通信以执行对等方通信和传输。传输控制协议(TCP)提供面向导向,可靠和端到端机构的连接。它试图控制数据包丢失,这是由于交通拥塞或传输错误。在本文中,我们介绍了现有的TCP变体:TCP Tahoe,Reno,Lite,Lite,New Reno,选修致谢(Sack),韦斯特伍德,拉斯维加斯和前进确认(Fack)的审查和比较。由于拥塞控制算法的激活或缺失,诸如缓慢的启动,拥塞避免,快速回收,重传,重传,重传,重传,快速重传,快速回收,重传,拥塞,拥塞控制和选择性确认机制,因此TCP的行为取决于TCP变体的类型不同。对于特定方案,必须了解该分析是必要的,以了解哪个TCP实现,将选择来自适当的方案。本文涵盖了所有变体及其算法,以观察其对其特征的自然。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号