首页> 外文期刊>Indian journal of Anaesthesia >Intravenous palonosetron compared with a combination of ramosetron and dexamethasone in preventing post operative nausea and vomiting in patients undergoing gynaecological surgeries under spinal anaesthesia, a randomised study
【24h】

Intravenous palonosetron compared with a combination of ramosetron and dexamethasone in preventing post operative nausea and vomiting in patients undergoing gynaecological surgeries under spinal anaesthesia, a randomised study

机译:静脉内帕隆核糖蛋白与ramosetron和地塞米松的组合相比,在脊髓麻醉下进行妇科手术的患者预防术后术后恶心和呕吐,随机研究

获取原文
       

摘要

Background and Aims: Post-operative nausea and vomiting (PONV) is one of the most common complications in patients undergoing gynaecological surgeries under spinal anaesthesia (SA). Palonosetron has the unique property of controlling 'delayed chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting' when compared to older serotonin antagonists. This study compared the effectiveness of palonosetron with a combination of ramosetron and dexamethasone in preventing PONV. Methods: Sixty patients undergoing gynaecological surgeries under SA were randomly allocated into two groups of thirty each,to receive either a combination of 0.3 mg of ramosetron and 8 mg of dexamethasone intravenously (IV) (Group RD) or 0.075 mg of palonosetron IV (Group P). The incidence of PONV, number of complete responders (no nausea, vomiting or use of rescue anti-emetics) and severity of nausea were evaluated during intra- and post-operative period. Results: The incidence of complete responders during intraoperative period was 80.0% in Group RD and 76.7% in Group P (P = 0.074) whereas postoperatively at 0–2 h and 2–6 h, it was 73.3% and 83.3% in Group RD respectively as compared to 46.6% and 56.6% in Group P respectively (P = 0.016 and P= 0.024). The incidence of PONV during 24 h of post-operative period was 30.00% in Group RD as compared to 60.00% in Group P (P = 0.0195). Nausea severity score and use of rescue anti-emetics did not vary between the groups. Conclusion: Combination of ramosetron and dexamethasone is more effective than palonosetron alone in preventing PONV in patients undergoing gynaecological surgeries under SA.
机译:背景和目的:术后恶心和呕吐(PONV)是在脊髓麻醉下进行妇科手术的患者中最常见的并发症之一。与较老的血清素拮抗剂相比,Palonosetron具有控制“延迟化疗诱导的恶心和呕吐”的独特性。该研究将Pharonosetron与ramosetron和地塞米松的组合的有效性与预防PONV相比。方法:在SA下进行妇科手术的60例患者被随机分配成两组三十,接受0.3mg ramosetron和8mg静脉内塞米松(IV)(基团Rd)或0.075mg Palonosetron IV的组合(基团P)。在手术期间和后期和后期后,在和后期的时间内评估PONV的发病率,完全响应者(没有恶心,抢救抗急性的使用)和恶心的严重程度。结果:在术后期间的完整响应者的发病率为GD组80.0%,P组(P = 0.074),术后76.7%(P = 0.074),术后0-2小时和2-6小时,其中RD组为73.3%和83.3%分别在P组中分别比46.6%和56.6%相比(P = 0.016和P = 0.024)。在术后期间24小时内PONV的发生率为GD组的30.00%,而P组的60.00%(P = 0.0195)。恶心的严重程度得分和救援抗急性的使用在组之间没有各种各样。结论:ramosetron和地塞米松的组合比Palonosetron更有效,单独在预防SA下进行妇科手术的患者中预防PONV。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号