首页> 外文期刊>International journal of biomedical imaging >A Semi-Automated Usability Evaluation Framework for Interactive Image Segmentation Systems
【24h】

A Semi-Automated Usability Evaluation Framework for Interactive Image Segmentation Systems

机译:交互式图像分割系统的半自动可用性评估框架

获取原文
           

摘要

For complex segmentation tasks, the achievable accuracy of fully automated systems is inherently limited. Specifically, when a precise segmentation result is desired for a small amount of given data sets, semi-automatic methods exhibit a clear benefit for the user. The optimization of human computer interaction (HCI) is an essential part of interactive image segmentation. Nevertheless, publications introducing novel interactive segmentation systems (ISS) often lack an objective comparison of HCI aspects. It is demonstrated that even when the underlying segmentation algorithm is the same throughout interactive prototypes, their user experience may vary substantially. As a result, users prefer simple interfaces as well as a considerable degree of freedom to control each iterative step of the segmentation. In this article, an objective method for the comparison of ISS is proposed, based on extensive user studies. A summative qualitative content analysis is conducted via abstraction of visual and verbal feedback given by the participants. A direct assessment of the segmentation system is executed by the users via the system usability scale (SUS) and AttrakDiff-2 questionnaires. Furthermore, an approximation of the findings regarding usability aspects in those studies is introduced, conducted solely from the system-measurable user actions during their usage of interactive segmentation prototypes. The prediction of all questionnaire results has an average relative error of 8.9%, which is close to the expected precision of the questionnaire results themselves. This automated evaluation scheme may significantly reduce the resources necessary to investigate each variation of a prototype’s user interface (UI) features and segmentation methodologies.
机译:对于复杂的分割任务,可实现的全自动系统的可实现精度是有限的。具体地,当少量给定数据集期望需要精确的分割结果时,半自动方法对用户呈现明确的益处。人体计算机交互(HCI)的优化是交互式图像分割的重要组成部分。然而,引入新型互动分割系统(ISS)的出版物通常缺乏HCI方面的客观比较。据证明,即使当底层分割算法在整个交互式原型中相同时,它们的用户体验也可能会大大变化。结果,用户更喜欢简单的接口以及控制分割的每个迭代步骤的相当程度的自由度。在本文中,基于广泛的用户研究,提出了一种用于比较ISS的客观方法。通过参与者给出的视觉和口头反馈进行抽象进行总结定性内容分析。通过系统可用规模(SUS)和ATTRAKDIFF-2问卷调查问卷,用户执行对分段系统的直接评估。此外,引入了关于这些研究中的可用性方面的结果的近似,仅来自系统可测量的用户动作在它们使用交互式分段原型期间进行。所有问卷结果的预测平均相对误差为8.9%,接近调查结果的预期精度。这种自动评估方案可以显着降低研究原型用户界面(UI)特征和分段方法的每个变体所需的资源。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号