...
首页> 外文期刊>Infectious Diseases and Therapy >Challenges to Differentiate Hepatitis C Genotype 1 and 6: Results from A Field-Study in Cambodia
【24h】

Challenges to Differentiate Hepatitis C Genotype 1 and 6: Results from A Field-Study in Cambodia

机译:区分丙型肝炎基因型1和6的挑战:柬埔寨的田间研究结果

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

IntroductionWe aim to report on results and challenges of different methods used for hepatitis C (HCV) genotyping in a Cambodian HCV/HIV coinfection project.MethodsSamples of 106 patients were available. HCV genotyping was initially (63 samples) done by the LightPower Taqman real-time PCR method (Viet A Corp.) and quality controlled using the Versant 2.0 line probe assay (Siemens Healthcare). Next, following interim quality control results, all 106 samples were (re)genotyped with Versant 2.0, complemented with 5′UTR/core sequencing for uninterpretable/incomplete Versant results.ResultsUsing Versant, 103 (97.2%) of the 106 HCV-coinfected patients had an interpretable genotype result: 1b (50.5%), 6 non-a/non-b (30.1%), 1a (6.8%), 6a or b (4.9%), 2 (3.9%), 1 (2.9%) and 3 (1.0%). For 16 samples that were interpreted as genotype 1 or 1b per Versant's current instructions, it could not be excluded that it concerned a genotype 6 infection as the core region line patterns on the Versant test strip were unavailable, inconclusive or atypical. Upon sequencing, seven of these were genotyped as 1b and nine as genotype 6. Combining Versant and sequencing results, a definitive genotype was assigned in 104 patients: 1b (44.2%), 6 non-a/non-b (39.4%), 1a (6.7%), 6a or b (4.8%), 2 (3.8%) and 3 (1.0%). Genotyping by LightPower and Versant was discordant for 23 (of 63) samples. The LightPower assay misclassified all genotype 6 non-a/non-b samples as genotype 1, which indicates that this assay is only using 5′UTR information.ConclusionsHCV genotype 1b and genotype 6 non-a/non-b were most common. With Versant 2.0 (using 5′UTR and core information), genotype classification (1 or 6) remained inconclusive in 15% of samples. The locally available method (LightPower assay) failed to identify genotype 6 non-a/non-b, which highlights that methods using 5′UTR information only should not be used in Cambodia. Regional/national guidelines should be explicit about this.Trial RegistrationThis study was performed as part of a larger cross-sectional study on the burden of hepatitis C coinfection in HIV patients in Cambodia (Clinical.trials.gov: HCV-Epi NCT02361541).
机译:介绍我们旨在报告用于柬埔寨HCV / HIV繁殖项目中丙型肝炎(HCV)基因分型的不同方法的结果和挑战。可获得106例患者的方法。 HCV基因分型最初(63个样品)通过LightPower Taqman实时PCR方法(越来越多的Corp.)和使用Versant 2.0线探针测定(Siemens Healthcare)进行的质量控制。接下来,遵循临时质量控制结果,所有106个样本都是(RE)与Versant 2.0的基因分型,辅以未诠释/不完全的效果的5'UTR /核心测序。评估的106例,103(97.2%)的106个HCV-Finffected患者具有可解释的基因型结果:1B(50.5%),6个非A /非B(30.1%),1A(6.8%),6A或B(4.9%),2(3.9%),1(2.9%)和3(1.0%)。对于每次更常见的指令被解释为基因型1或1B的16个样品,不能排除它涉及基因型6感染,因为Versant测试条上的核心区域线图案不可用,不确定或非典型。在测序后,其中七种是基因分型作为1B和九作为基因型6.结合了versant和序列结果,在104例患者中分配了一个明确的基因型:1B(44.2%),6个非A /非B(39.4%), 1A(6.7%),6A或B(4.8%),2(3.8%)和3(1.0%)。 LightPower的基因分型和敏感的23(63)样品不和谐。 LightPower测定将所有基因型6个非A /非B样品分类为基因型1,这表明该测定仅使用5'UTR信息。结合HCV基因型1B和基因型6非A /非B是最常见的。对于Versant 2.0(使用5'UTR和核心信息),基因型分类(1或6)在15%的样品中仍然不确定。本地可用的方法(LightPower测定)未能识别基因型6非A / NON-B,这突出了使用5'UTR信息的方法不应在柬埔寨使用。区域/国家指南应该明确到这一点.Tirial resideSthis研究是作为柬埔寨HIV患者丙型肝炎繁殖负担的更大横断面研究的一部分(临床.Tirials.gov:HCV-EPI NCT0231541)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号