首页> 外文期刊>Infection and Drug Resistance >Inappropriate Antibiotic Use Among Inpatients Attending Madda Walabu University Goba Referral Hospital, Southeast Ethiopia: Implication for Future Use
【24h】

Inappropriate Antibiotic Use Among Inpatients Attending Madda Walabu University Goba Referral Hospital, Southeast Ethiopia: Implication for Future Use

机译:在参加Madda Walabu University Goba推荐医院的住院患者,东南埃塞俄比亚的住院患者不适当地使用:对未来使用的含义

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: Ethiopia is one of the countries where the healthcare system is not yet developed to the required level; hence, it is not uncommon that drugs, particularly antimicrobials, are inappropriately used for infections by any causative agents, with or without prescription, in combination or not, and, of more concern, without sensitivity tests. So, it was considered important to assess the magnitude of inappropriate antimicrobial use among inpatients attending Madda Walabu University Goba Referral Hospital, southeast Ethiopia. Methods: A health institution-based cross-sectional study was conducted from September 2018 to April 2019. Patient folders from collaborating wards were reviewed for antibiotic use. Inappropriateness of a drug or its dosage, or both, was considered in reference to the Ethiopian national treatment guideline. The information obtained was analyzed using SPSS version 20. Patterns of prescription of antimicrobials for the hospitalized patients were analyzed using simple descriptive statistics. Results: A total of 801 antibiotics were written as prescriptions to 471 clients, 228 (47.6%) of whom had received two or more antibiotics at the time of the study. Of the total prescribed antibiotics, 142 (30.1%) had an inappropriate prescription. Genitourinary tract infections accounted for 42 (30.4%) of the inappropriate prescriptions due to the wrong dose and drugs. Cephalosporins were the most extensively prescribed class of antibiotics, 24.4% of which were inappropriately prescribed. Intravenous formulations made up the largest proportion of prescriptions, at 335 (41.8%). The most commonly prescribed antimicrobials were cephalosporins, 178 (38%); nitroimidazoles, 115 (24.5%); and macrolides, 53 (11.3%), while ceftriaxone was prescribed in 249 (53%) and metronidazole in 123 (26.2%) cases. Conclusion: Low dose, inadequate duration and empiric use of antibiotics were major causes of inappropriate use in the study area. Therefore, local antimicrobial sensitivity tests, antibiotic stewardship and following the national treatment guideline are recommended to overcome inappropriate antimicrobial use.
机译:背景:埃塞俄比亚是医疗保健系统尚未发展到所需水平的国家之一;因此,药物,特别是抗微生物剂量不恰当地用于感染的任何致命试剂,或没有处方,或者在没有敏感性试验的情况下,不常用的药物,特别是在没有敏感性试验的情况下,并不罕见。因此,评估位于埃塞俄比亚东南部的海滩海滩大学戈巴转诊医院的住院患者中不恰当的抗微生物用途的尺寸是重要的。方法:2018年9月至2019年9月进行了基于卫生机构的横截面研究。来自合作病房的患者文件夹进行抗生素使用。考虑到埃塞俄比亚国家待遇指南的药物或其剂量或两者的不恰当性。使用SPSS版本20分析所获得的信息。使用简单的描述统计分析住院患者的抗微生物剂的处方模式。结果:共有801种抗生素作为471名客户的处方写入,其中228名(47.6%)在研究时接受了两种或更多种抗生素。规定的抗生素总,142(30.1%)有不恰当的处方。由于错误剂量和药物,泌尿生殖道感染占42(30.4%)的不恰当处方。头孢菌素是最广泛的规定的抗生素类,其中24.4%是不恰当的处方。静脉化制剂占上正比例最大,335(41.8%)。最常见的抗微生物剂是头孢菌素,178(38%); Nitroimidazoles,115(24.5%);和大啰啉,53(11.3%),而在123例(26.2%)病例中,Ceftriaxone在249(53%)和甲硝唑中规定。结论:低剂量,持续时间不适当,抗生素的验证使用是研究区域不恰当使用的主要原因。因此,建议局部抗菌敏感性试验,抗生素管道和国民治疗指南追求不恰当的抗微生物使用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号