...
首页> 外文期刊>Infection and Drug Resistance >Interprofessional Antimicrobial Stewardship Influencing Clostridioides difficile Infection: An 8-Year Study Using Antimicrobial Use Density
【24h】

Interprofessional Antimicrobial Stewardship Influencing Clostridioides difficile Infection: An 8-Year Study Using Antimicrobial Use Density

机译:影响梭菌梭菌感染的贸易型抗微生物管道:使用抗微生物使用密度的8年性研究

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Purpose: To reduce Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI), we implemented interprofessional antimicrobial, infection control, and diagnostic stewardship (ipAS) conducted by physicians/pharmacists, infection control nurses, and medical technologists, respectively. As a numerical indicator for ipAS, we used antimicrobial use density (AUD) in an 8-year study to validate its efficacy in CDI reduction. Patients and methods: This was an observational study. CDI was defined as stool samples or C. difficile isolates containing toxin A and/or B from a patient with diarrhea occurring three or more times per day. From 2011–2018 at a 10-ward single site the subjects were in-patients with CDI, and the following data were collected: AUDs for 23 antibiotics, and antimicrobial test results. By 2015, we had established ipAS, consisting of culture submission before the administration of broad-spectrum antimicrobials, the promotion of point-of-care testing for diagnosis-based antimicrobials, perioperative prophylactic antibiotics, intervention at positive diagnosis of blood culture, team round for diarrhea, and inspection on contact precautions and disinfection in CDI cases. The study outcomes included annual numbers of CDI patients and blood culture sets. We compared annual AUDs between former (2011–14) and latter (2015–18) periods using Kruskal–Wallis tests and examined the correlation between AUDs and CDI numbers. Results: Of a total 50,970 patients, 1,750 patients underwent C. difficile toxin tests, of whom 171 patients (9.8%) were positive for CDI. Between the former and latter periods, AUDs for flomoxef (11.96 to 2.71 by medians), panipenem/betamipron (0.30 to 0.00), and clindamycin (3.87 to 2.19) significantly decreased ( P 0.05) as did numbers of CDIs (26.5 to 10) ( P =0.043). The correlation analysis revealed a significant correlation between AUD for flomoxef and CDIs ( P =0.004) and the AUD for piperacillin/tazobactam and CDIs ( P =0.010) with a positive Pearson r. Conclusion: The integrated antimicrobial, diagnostic, and infection control approach used in ipAS may reduce CDIs.
机译:目的:为了减少梭菌梭菌感染(CDI),我们分别实施了医生/药剂师,感染控制护士和医疗技术人员进行的思想抗微生物,感染控制和诊断管理(IPAS)。作为IPAS的数值指示,我们在8年的研究中使用了抗菌用密度(AUD)以验证其在CDI减少中的功效。患者和方法:这是一个观察性研究。 CDI被定义为粪便样品或含有毒素A和/或B的艰难梭菌分离物,从患有腹泻的患者每天发生三次或更多次。从2011-2018在10个病房单一地点,受试者患有CDI的患者,收集以下数据:23例抗生素和抗菌试验结果。到2015年,我们建立了IPAS,由文化提交组成,包括广谱抗菌剂,促进基于诊断的抗微生物,围手术期预防性抗生素,血液培养阳性诊断的干预,促进血液培养的干预对于腹泻,并检验CDI病例中的接触注意事项和消毒。研究结果包括年度CDI患者和血液文化套装。我们将前(2011-14)和后者(2015-18)期间的年度澳元相比使用Kruskal-Wallis测试,并检查了澳元和CDI编号之间的相关性。结果:总共50,970名患者,1,750名患者接受了艰难的毒素试验,其中171名患者(9.8%)为CDI阳性。前者与后一期间,Flomoxef(中位数11.96至2.71)的AUDS,Panipenem / Betampron(0.30〜0.00)和Clindamycin(3.87至2.19)显着降低(P <0.05),如CDI的数量(26.5至10) )(p = 0.043)。相关分析显示Flomoxef和CDIS(p = 0.004)与哌啶/塔唑胺和CDIS(P = 0.010)的副杀菌剂之间的显着相关性,具有正皮子r。结论:IPA中使用的综合抗微生物,诊断和感染控制方法可减少CDIS。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号