首页> 外文期刊>Implementation Science >Identifying relevant concepts and factors for the sustainability of evidence-based practices within acute care contexts: a systematic review and theory analysis of selected sustainability frameworks
【24h】

Identifying relevant concepts and factors for the sustainability of evidence-based practices within acute care contexts: a systematic review and theory analysis of selected sustainability frameworks

机译:识别急性护理背景下基于证据的实践可持续性的相关概念和因素:所选可持续性框架的系统审查和理论分析

获取原文
       

摘要

BACKGROUND:There is growing recognition among healthcare professionals that the sustainability of evidence-based practices (EBPs) within different settings is variable and suboptimal. Understanding why a particular EBP might be sustained in one setting and not another remains unclear. Recent reviews illustrate the need to identify and analyze existing frameworks/models/theories (F/M/Ts) that focus solely on the sustainability of EBPs in specific healthcare settings, such as acute care, to illuminate key determinants and facilitate appropriate selection to guide practice and research.METHODS:We conducted a systematic review to extract sustainability frameworks. This involved using two available syntheses of the literature and a systematic search of four databases from January 2015 to July 2018: CINHAL, MEDLINE, Embase, and ProQuest. We included studies published in English, and if they included sustainability F/M/Ts recommended for use in acute care or an unspecified healthcare organization/setting. F/M/Ts explicitly recommended for use in public health and or community settings were excluded. We then conducted a comparative analysis of F/M/Ts using a modified theory analysis approach, to understand the theoretical underpinnings of each F/M/T, their determinants and concepts hypothesized to influence the sustained use of EBPs within an acute care context.RESULTS:Of 2967 identified citations from the 2 available syntheses and the systematic review, 8 F/M/Ts met the inclusion criteria. We identified 37 core factors, of which 16 were recorded as common factors (occurring within 4 or more of the 8 included F/M/Ts). All factors grouped into 7 main themes: innovation, adopters, leadership and management, inner context, inner processes, outer context, and outcomes.CONCLUSIONS:This systematic review is the first to include a comprehensive analysis of healthcare sustainability F/M/Ts for the sustained use of EBPs in acute care settings. Findings reveal insights into sustainability as a "process or ongoing stage of use" following initial implementation, suggesting this construct should be added to the definition of sustainability. Results provide a resource of available F/M/Ts and hypothesized factors to consider for acute care team members who are planning or currently implementing EBPs with the goal of improving patient outcomes. It also provides a basis for future research on sustainability in acute care.
机译:背景:医疗保健专业人员之间的认可日益越来越高,以至于在不同环境中基于证据的实践(EBP)的可持续性是可变的和次优。了解为什么特定EBP可能在一个设置中持续,而不是另一种仍然尚不清楚。最近的评价说明了需要识别和分析现有框架/型号/理论(F / M / TS),该框架/型号/理论(F / M / TS)专注于EBPS在特定医疗保健环境中的可持续性,例如急性护理,以照亮关键决定因素,并促进指导适当的选择实践和研究。方法:我们对提取可持续性框架进行了系统审查。这涉及使用来自文献的两个可用合成,并从2015年1月到2018年7月的四个数据库系统搜索:Cinhal,Medline,Embase和Proquest。我们包括英文发布的研究,如果它们包括可持续发展F / M / TS,推荐用于急性护理或未指明的医疗保健组织/设置。 F / M / TS明确推荐用于公共健康和或社区设置的使用。然后,我们使用修改理论分析方法对F / M / TS进行了比较分析,以了解每个F / M / T,其决定因素和假设的理论下限,以影响急性护理背景中的eBP持续使用。结果:2967年鉴定的2种可用合成和系统评价,8 F / M / TS符合纳入标准。我们确定了37个核心因素,其中16个被记录为常见因素(在8个包含的F / M / TS中的4个或更多内发生)。分为7个主要主题的所有因素:创新,采用者,领导和管理,内心背景,内部流程,外观背景和结果。结论:这个系统审查是第一个包括对医疗保健可持续性的全面分析f / m / ts。急性护理环境中持续使用EBP。调查结果显示初步实施后的“使用或正在进行的使用阶段”的洞察力,这表明该构建应加入可持续性的定义。结果提供了可用的F / M / TS和假设因素的资源,以考虑规划或目前正在实施EBP的急性护理团队成员,其目的是改善患者结果。它还为未来的急性护理中的可持续性研究提供了基础。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号