首页> 外文期刊>Implementation Science >Leveraging routine clinical materials and mobile technology to assess CBT fidelity: the Innovative Methods to Assess Psychotherapy Practices (imAPP) study
【24h】

Leveraging routine clinical materials and mobile technology to assess CBT fidelity: the Innovative Methods to Assess Psychotherapy Practices (imAPP) study

机译:利用常规临床材料和移动技术评估CBT保真度:评估心理治疗实践(IMAPP)研究的创新方法

获取原文
           

摘要

Identifying scalable strategies for assessing fidelity is a key challenge in implementation science. However, for psychosocial interventions, the existing, reliable ways to test treatment fidelity quality are often labor intensive, and less burdensome strategies may not reflect actual clinical practice. Cognitive behavioral therapies (CBTs) provide clinicians with a set of effective core elements to help treat a multitude of disorders, which, evidence suggests, need to be delivered with fidelity to maximize potential client impact. The current "gold standard" for rating CBTs is rating recordings of therapy sessions, which is extremely time-consuming and requires a substantial amount of initial training. Although CBTs can vary based on the target disorder, one common element employed in most CBTs is the use of worksheets to identify specific behaviors and thoughts that affect a client's ability to recover. The present study will develop and evaluate an innovative new approach to rate CBT fidelity, by developing a universal CBT scoring system based on worksheets completed in therapy sessions. To develop a scoring system for CBT worksheets, we will compile common CBT elements from a variety of CBT worksheets for a range of psychiatric disorders and create adherence and competence measures. We will collect archival worksheets from past studies to test the scoring system and assess test-retest reliability. To evaluate whether CBT worksheet scoring accurately reflects clinician fidelity, we will recruit clinicians who are engaged in a CBT for depression, anxiety, and/or posttraumatic stress disorder. Clinicians and clients will transmit routine therapy materials produced in session (e.g., worksheets, clinical notes, session recordings) to the study team after each session. We will compare observer-rated fidelity, clinical notes, and fidelity-rated worksheets to identify the most effective and efficient method to assess clinician fidelity. Clients will also be randomly assigned to either complete the CBT worksheets on paper forms or on a mobile application (app) to learn if worksheet format influences clinician and client experience or differs in terms of reflecting fidelity. Scoring fidelity using CBT worksheets may allow clinics to test fidelity in a short and effective manner, enhancing continuous quality improvement in the workplace. Clinicians and clinics can use such data to improve clinician fidelity in real time, leading to improved patient outcomes. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03479398 . Retrospectively registered March 20, 2018.
机译:确定评估保真度的可扩展策略是实现科学的关键挑战。然而,对于心理社会干预措施,现有的,可靠的测试待遇质量的方法往往是劳动密集型的劳动密集,而且均多繁琐的策略可能无法反映实际的临床实践。认知行为疗法(CBT)为临床医生提供一系列有效的核心元素,以帮助治疗众多疾病,证据表明,需要通过保真度提供,以最大限度地提高潜在的客户影响。用于评级CBT的当前“黄金标准”是治疗课程的评级记录,这是非常耗时的,需要大量的初始培训。尽管CBT可以根据目标疾病而变化,但大多数CBT中使用的一个共同元素是使用工作表来确定影响客户恢复能力的特定行为和思想。本研究将通过开发基于治疗课程的工作表的通用CBT评分系统,制定和评估利率CBT保真度的创新方法。为了开发CBT工作表的评分系统,我们将在各种CBT工作表中编制共同的CBT元素,以获得一系列精神疾病并产生遵守和能力措施。我们将从过去的研究中收集档案工作表,以测试评分系统并评估测试 - 重新测试可靠性。为了评估CBT工作表是否准确地反映临床医生保真度,我们将招募从事抑郁,焦虑和/或手术压力障碍的CBT的临床医生。临床医生和客户将在每次会议后向研究团队进行常规治疗材料(例如,工作表,临床笔记,会议记录)。我们将比较观察者额定保真度,临​​床票据和富达额定工作表,以确定最有效和高效的评估临床医生保真度的方法。客户端也将被随机分配到纸张表单上或在移动应用程序(应用程序)上完成CBT工作表,以了解工作表格格式是否影响临床医生和客户体验或在反映保真度方面不同。使用CBT工作表的评分保真度可能允许诊所以简短而有效的方式测试保真度,提高工作场所的持续质量改善。临床医生和诊所可以使用此类数据实时改善临床医生保真度,从而提高患者结果。 ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03479398。回顾性注册2018年3月20日。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号