首页> 外文期刊>Implementation Science >Navigating the sustainability landscape: a systematic review of sustainability approaches in healthcare
【24h】

Navigating the sustainability landscape: a systematic review of sustainability approaches in healthcare

机译:导航可持续发展景观:对医疗保健的可持续发展方法进行系统审查

获取原文
       

摘要

Improvement initiatives offer a valuable mechanism for delivering and testing innovations in healthcare settings. Many of these initiatives deliver meaningful and necessary changes to patient care and outcomes. However, many improvement initiatives fail to sustain to a point where their full benefits can be realised. This has led many researchers and healthcare practitioners to develop frameworks, models and tools to support and monitor sustainability. This work aimed to identify what approaches are available to assess and influence sustainability in healthcare and to describe the different perspectives, applications and constructs within these approaches to guide their future use. A systematic review was carried out following PRISMA guidelines to identify publications that reported approaches to support or influence sustainability in healthcare. Eligibility criteria were defined through an iterative process in which two reviewers independently assessed 20% of articles to test the objectivity of the selection criteria. Data were extracted from the identified articles, and a template analysis was undertaken to identify and assess the sustainability constructs within each reported approach. The search strategy identified 1748 publications with 227 articles retrieved in full text for full documentary analysis. In total, 62 publications identifying a sustainability approach were included in this review (32 frameworks, 16 models, 8 tools, 4 strategies, 1 checklist and 1 process). Constructs across approaches were compared and 40 individual constructs for sustainability were found. Comparison across approaches demonstrated consistent constructs were seen regardless of proposed interventions, setting or level of application with 6 constructs included in 75% of the approaches. Although similarities were found, no approaches contained the same combination of the constructs nor did any single approach capture all identified constructs. From these results, a consolidated framework for sustainability constructs in healthcare was developed. Choosing a sustainability method can pose a challenge because of the diverse approaches reported in the literature. This review provides a valuable resource to researchers, healthcare professionals and improvement practitioners by providing a summary of available sustainability approaches and their characteristics. This review was registered on the PROSPERO database: CRD42016040081 in June 2016.
机译:改进举措提供了一种有价值的机制,可以在医疗保健环境中提供和测试创新。许多这些举措对患者护理和结果提供了有意义和必要的变化。但是,许多改进措施未能维持能够实现其全部福利的程度。这引出了许多研究人员和医疗保健从业人员开发支持和监控可持续性的框架,模型和工具。这项工作旨在确定可以在医疗保健中评估和影响可持续性的可用方法,并描述这些方法中的不同观点,应用和构建,以指导他们未来的使用。在PRISMA准则下进行了系统审查,以确定报告支持或影响医疗保健可持续性的方法的出版物。资格标准通过迭代过程定义,其中两名审稿人独立评估了20%的文章,以测试选择标准的客观性。从所鉴定的制品中提取数据,并进行了模板分析以确定和评估每个报告的方法内的可持续性构建体。搜索策略确定了1748个出版物,在全文中检索了227篇文章,以进行全文进行全文分析。共有62项识别可持续发展方法的出版物被列入了本报告(32个框架,16个型号,8个工具,4个策略,1个清单和1个过程)。比较了跨越方法的构建,并发现了40个可持续性构建体。跨接近的比较显示出一致的构建体,无论提出的拟议的干预,设定或水平,其中6个构建体中包含在75%的方法中。尽管发现了相似之处,但没有含有相同的构建体组合,也没有任何单一方法捕获所有识别的构建体。从这些结果开始,开发了医疗保健中的可持续性构建综合框架。选择可持续性方法可能会造成挑战,因为文献中报道的不同方法。本次审查通过提供可持续发展方法及其特征,为研究人员,医疗专业人士和改善从业者提供有价值的资源。该评论在Prospero数据库上注册:2016年6月CRD42016040081。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号