首页> 外文期刊>Implementation Science >Evidence-based intervention sustainability strategies: a systematic review
【24h】

Evidence-based intervention sustainability strategies: a systematic review

机译:基于证据的干预可持续性战略:系统审查

获取原文
           

摘要

Sustainability of evidence-based interventions (EBI) remains a challenge for public health community-based institutions. The conceptual definition of sustainment is not universally agreed upon by researchers and practitioners, and strategies utilized to facilitate sustainment of EBI are not consistently reported in published literature. Given these limitations in the field, a systematic review was conducted to summarize the existing evidence supporting discrete sustainment strategies for public health EBIs and facilitating and hindering factors of sustainment. We searched PsychINFO, Embase, ProQuest, PubMed, and Google Scholar. The initial search was run in March 2017 and an update was done in March 2019. Study eligibility criteria included (a) public health evidence-based interventions, (b) conducted in the community or community-based settings, and (c) reported outcomes related to EBI sustainment. Details characterizing the study setting, design, target population, and type of EBI sustained were extracted. A total of 26 articles published from 2004 to 2019 were eligible for data extraction. Overall, the importance of sustainability was acknowledged across all of the studies. However, only seven studies presented a conceptual definition of sustainment explicitly within the text. Six of the included studies reported specific sustainment strategies that were used to facilitate the sustainment of EBI. Only three of the studies reported their activities related to sustainment by referencing a sustainment framework. Multiple facilitators (i.e., adaptation/alignment, funding) and barriers (i.e., limited funding, limited resources) were identified as influencing EBI sustainment. The majority (n?=?20) of the studies were conducted in high-income countries.?Studies from low-income countries were mostly naturalistic. All of the studies from low-income countries reported lack of funding as a hindrance to sustainment. Literature focused on sustainment of public health EBIs should present an explicit definition of the concept. Better reporting of the framework utilized, steps followed, and adaptations made to sustain the intervention might contribute to standardizing and developing the concept. Moreover, encouraging longitudinal dissemination and implementation (D&I) research especially in low-income countries might help strengthen D&I research capacity in public health settings.
机译:循证干预措施的可持续性(EBI)对公共卫生社区的机构仍然是一项挑战。维持的概念定义是由研究人员和从业者普遍同意的,并且利用促进EBI的经验的策略在出版的文献中并未持续报告。鉴于该领域的这些限制,进行了系统审查,总结了支持公共卫生惠民和促进和妨碍残疾因素的离散可持续策略的现有证据。我们搜索了Psychinfo,Embase,Proquest,PubMed和Google学者。初始搜索于2017年3月运行,并于2019年3月完成更新。研究资格标准包括(a)在社区或社区的环境中进行的公共卫生证据的干预措施,(b)报告的结果与ebi维持有关。提取了表征研究设定,设计,目标人口和ebi持续类型的细节。共有26篇文章从2004年至2019年发布的有资格获得数据提取。总体而言,所有研究都承认了可持续性的重要性。但是,只有七项研究在文中明确提出了概念性定义。其中六项研究报告了用于促进EBI的持续性的特定的维持策略。只有三项研究报告了他们通过参考可持续框架与维持有关的活动。多个辅导员(即适应/对准,资金)和障碍(即限量资金,有限资源)被确定为影响EBI维持。研究的大多数(n?=?20)在高收入国家进行。来自低收入国家的研究大多是自然主义的。低收入国家的所有研究报告缺乏资金作为维持的障碍。文学专注于公共卫生的持续性EBIS应该出现明确的概念定义。更好地报告利用的框架,遵循的步骤,以及维持干预的适应可能有助于标准化和发展概念。此外,鼓励纵向传播和实施(D&I)研究特别是在低收入国家可能有助于加强D&I的公共卫生环境的能力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号