首页> 外文期刊>Indian Journal of Dental Research >An in vitro comparison between the apical sealing abilities of resilon with Epiphany? sealer and gutta-percha with AH plus sealer
【24h】

An in vitro comparison between the apical sealing abilities of resilon with Epiphany? sealer and gutta-percha with AH plus sealer

机译:与末切膜的重新植物的顶端密封能力之间的体外比较?封口机和Gutta-percha用啊加上封口机

获取原文
           

摘要

Context: The study assesses the apical sealing ability of two obturating materials (resilon and gutta-percha) with their sealants by means of the dye penetration method using India ink. Aims: To compare the resistance to apical dye penetration between resilon (with Epiphany sealer; Epiphany®, Pentron clinical technologies, USA) and gutta-percha (with AH Plus sealer; Dentsply, Maillefer, Germany). It was hypothesized that there would be no difference between the two groups with regard to apical dye penetration. Settings and design: Hundred mandibular first premolars from individuals aged between 20 to 25 years were selected after their lengths were standardized. Materials and Methods: Instrumentation was performed with NiTi hand protaper files (Dentsply, Maillefer) using EDTA paste and copious irrigation with 2.5% sodium hypochlorite. Experimental group 1 consisted of roots that were treated with Epiphany primer and obturated with resilon (with Epiphany sealer). Experimental group 2 consisted of those obturated with gutta-percha using AH Plus sealer. The samples were immersed in blue India Ink and cleared using 5% nitric acid. Dye penetration was assessed under a stereomicroscope. Statistical analysis: Mann-Whitney U test. Results: Roots obturated with resilon core material and Epiphany sealer exhibited lesser mean apical dye penetration (1.281 mm; SD: 0.742) in comparison to those obturated with gutta-percha and AH plus sealer (2.154 mm; SD: 0.814). The difference was found to be highly significant (P0.0025). Conclusion: Resilon (with Epiphany sealer) provided better radicular apical sealing in comparison to gutta percha (with AH Plus sealer).
机译:背景:该研究通过使用印度墨水的染料渗透方法评估两种闭合材料(Reselon和Gutta-Percha)的顶端密封能力。目的:比较重新植物之间的抗顶端染料渗透(用EPIPHANY封口器; EPIPHANY ®,戊龙临床技术,美国)和GUTTA-PERCHA(带有啊加上封口机; Lentsply,Maillefer,德国)。假设这两组关于顶端染料渗透性没有差异。设置和设计:在其长度标准化后,选择从20至25岁的个体之间的百根颌骨第一次前母。材料和方法:使用EDTA粘贴和2.5%次氯酸钠的EDTA糊和大量灌溉进行NITI手替代品文件(Lentsply,Maillefer)进行仪表。实验组1由用胚胎底漆处理的根,并用Resilon封闭(用Epiphany封口剂)。实验组2包括使用AH Plus封口机与Gutta-Percha充满的那些。将样品浸入蓝色印度油墨中并用5%硝酸清除。在立体显微镜下评估染料渗透。统计分析:Mann-Whitney U测试。结果:与旋转芯材料和截面纤维封闭剂饱和的根呈较小的平均染料渗透(1.281mm; SD:0.742),与诸如Gutta-Percha和Ah Plus封闭件的那些(2.154mm; SD:0.814)。发现差异非常显着(P <0.0025)。结论:与Gutta percha(用艾哈降密封剂)相比,Resilon(用ePiphany封口机)提供了更好的自然顶部密封。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号