首页> 外文期刊>Independent Journal of Management & Production >Legal regulation and trends of audit services: what are the differences (evidence of Ukraine)
【24h】

Legal regulation and trends of audit services: what are the differences (evidence of Ukraine)

机译:审计服务的法律监管和趋势:差异有什么差异(乌克兰的证据)

获取原文
       

摘要

The authors conducted a study aimed to identify discrepancies between the practice in providing audit services and the regulatory framework for their implementation in Ukraine. The purpose of article is to answer questions: are there any differences between the practice of development of types of audit services and regulatory documents for their implementation based on the experience of Ukrainian auditors; what are the differences in the practice of auditing firms in classifying and using the auditors terminology in contrast to the standards and requirements of the legal documents. A hypothesis was formulated, which later on received a confirmation. By carrying out analytical procedures, the theoretical approaches to the classification of audit services were considered. The authors correlate different classification of audit services in normative documents, including documents of the professional organization of auditors. The results of the study of the terminology content, which is used to identify different types of audit services, have shown the differences between scientists' opinions and different interpretations in auditors practice. Current research is aimed at improving the theoretical and practical provisions for the implementation of related and other services of professional audit services, development of concepts for theoretical support and practical implementation for harmonization of legal regulations and practices of auditors (audit firms).?The conclusion of this paper helps to identify vectors in the development of a regulatory framework of audit services on the national level.
机译:作者进行了一项研究,旨在确定在乌克兰实施审计服务和监管框架方面的实践之间的差异。文章的目的是回答问题:根据乌克兰审计员的经验,审计服务类型和监管文件的发展实践之间存在差异;与法律文件的标准和要求相比,审计公司在分类和使用审计员术语方面有什么差异。制定了假设,后来接受了确认。通过进行分析程序,考虑了审计服务分类的理论方法。作者在规范文件中关联了不同分类的审计服务,包括审计员专业组织的文件。用于识别不同类型的审计服务的术语内容的研究结果表明了科学家们的意见与审计师作的不同解释之间的差异。目前的研究旨在改善实施相关和其他服务的理论和实践规定,以执行职业审计服务的相关和其他服务,为统一审计员法律法规和实践的理论支持和实际实施的概念(审计公司)。?结论本文有助于识别在国家一级审计服务监管框架的发展中的向量。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号