...
首页> 外文期刊>Atmospheric and Climate Sciences >Validation of Three Satellite Precipitation Products in Two South-Western African Watersheds: Bandama (Ivory Coast) and Mono (Togo)
【24h】

Validation of Three Satellite Precipitation Products in Two South-Western African Watersheds: Bandama (Ivory Coast) and Mono (Togo)

机译:验证两种南方非洲流域三种卫星降水产品:Bandama(象牙海岸)和单声道(多哥)

获取原文
           

摘要

Satellite precipitation products are widely used in different domain, in area where there is a lack in observation. These have different spatio-temporal resolutions consequently resulting in different precipitation amounts depending on the product. The present study validates three satellite products, namely the Climate Hazard group Infrared Precipitation with Stations (CHIRPS), the Climate Research Unit (CRU) and the Global Precipitation Climatology Project (GPCP) over Bandama and Mono river basins for 1981-2005 and 1981-2016 respectively by comparing them to the observation precipitation of the basin. The available studies are focused on the regional scale but not on a watershed scale for hydrological studies. The analysis reveals that all the products are strongly correlated to each other as well as to the observed data at basin level. The Lamb coefficient test shows that most all the chosen basin namely Bandama and Mono presents the same climatic indices. All the products present the same variability and trend as the observation at basins scale. By comparing those products to observation, CHIRPS product following by GPCP give the lowest mean absolute error (MAE) at annual and seasonal time scales while CHIRPS is followed by CRU at monthly scale. Overall, all products overestimate the precipitation at Bandama basin while they underestimate it over Mono river basin. The comparison over 1981-2017 period of the total annual precipitation increasing southern ward (from Sahel to the coastal zone) for all the three studied products which varies from 300 mm to 2400 mm/year. All the three products are not significantly different from one another and they all highlight the same areas of hotspot rainfall in the region. The same conclusion is made at monthly and seasonal scales. Therefore, any of these products especially CHIRPS can be used for study in this region due to its lowest bias and MAE.
机译:卫星沉淀产品广泛用于不同领域,在观察缺乏的区域。因此,这些具有不同的时空分辨率,因此取决于产品的沉淀量。本研究验证了三种卫星产品,即气候危险组红外降水与车站(Chirps),气候研究单位(CRU)和全球降水高潮项目(GPCP)在1981-2005和1981年和1981年 - 2016分别通过将它们与盆地的观察降水进行比较。可用的研究专注于区域规模,但不对水文研究的流域规模。该分析表明,所有产品彼此强烈相关,以及在盆地水平上观察到的数据。 LAMB系数测试表明,大多数所选的盆地都是Candama和Mono呈现相同的气候指数。所有产品呈现与盆地尺度的观察相同的变异性和趋势。通过将这些产品与观察结果进行比较,GPCP的啁啾产品在年度和季节性时间尺度下给出了最低的平均绝对误差(MAE),而Chirps之后是每月规模的CRU。总的来说,所有产品都高估了支架盆地的降水,同时他们低估了莫诺河流域。比较1981年至2017年的一段时间,每年的南方病房(从Sahel到沿海地区)的所有三个研究的产品,这三个研究的产品可能从300毫米到2400毫米/年。所有这三种产品彼此没有显着差异,它们都突出了该地区热点降雨的同一领域。同样的结论是按月和季节性的尺度进行的。因此,由于其最低偏差和MAE,这些产品中的任何一种尤其是啁啾可以用于该区域的研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号