...
首页> 外文期刊>Australasian Journal of Construction Economics and Building >Life cycle carbon emissions and comparative evaluation of selected open source UK embodied carbon counting tools
【24h】

Life cycle carbon emissions and comparative evaluation of selected open source UK embodied carbon counting tools

机译:终生命周期碳排放和选定开源的比较评价英国体现碳计数工具

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Life cycle carbon emissions (LCO2), made up of operational and embodied carbon, have become a major metric of building environmental performance and energy efficiency. Whilst there are now standard methods for operational carbon assessment due to its significance in LCO2, there is still less emphasis on embodied carbon counting. However, the relative contribution of embodied carbon is on the rise as buildings become increasingly energy efficient. Following the rule that only something which is measurable is manageable, it is essential that we are able to accurately count embodied carbon. This study therefore reviews the concept of LCO2 in buildings and further investigates the open source UK tools for embodied carbon counting. A comparative evaluation case study, which validates an earlier review, showed that there is no logic and consistency in the carbon figures produced by embodied carbon counting tools. This is mainly due to different system boundaries, varying underlying assumptions and methodological differences in calculation. The findings suggest that an industry-agreed data structure and common methodology is needed for embodied carbon counting. Generally, the study provides insights into the use and capabilities of the identified open source UK embodied carbon counting tools, and is relevant to the on-going debate about carbon regulation.
机译:使用循环碳排放(LCO2),由运营和实施的碳组成,已成为建筑环境性能和能源效率的主要指标。虽然现在存在由于其在LCO2中的意义导致的运营碳评估的标准方法,但仍有对体现碳计数的重点较小。然而,随着建筑物越来越节能的情况,所体现的碳的相对贡献正在上升。遵循只有可衡量的东西的规则是可管理的,我们必须准确地计算碳。因此,本研究审查了建筑物中LCO2的概念,并进一步调查了用于实施碳计数的开源英国工具。对比较评估案例研究验证了先前的审查,表明,由实施的碳计数工具产生的碳数据没有逻辑和一致性。这主要是由于不同的系统边界,不同的潜在假设和计算方法差异。研究结果表明,所体现的碳计数需要行业商定的数据结构和常用方法。一般来说,该研究提供了对所确定的开源英国体现碳计数工具的使用和能力的见解,与关于碳规则的持续辩论有关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号