...
首页> 外文期刊>Advances in Orthopedics >Computation of Intersegmental Moments during Standing Posture: Can We Neglect the Horizontal Ground Reaction Force? Results from an Experimental Study
【24h】

Computation of Intersegmental Moments during Standing Posture: Can We Neglect the Horizontal Ground Reaction Force? Results from an Experimental Study

机译:站立姿势中的三角矩的计算:我们可以忽略水平地面反作用力吗?试验研究结果

获取原文
           

摘要

Background. The development of postural analysis thanks to force and pressure platforms, in order to determine the center of pressure, can be valuable in the setting of spinal malalignment. The purpose of this study was to compare “pressure” and “force” platforms for the evaluation of the center of pressure. In other words, can we neglect the horizontal ground reaction force in the evaluation of intersegmental moments during standing posture? Methods. Postural data from two healthy adult volunteers were analyzed. Analysis of the posture was done according to a protocol providing sagittal intersegmental moments. A set of 36 markers was used to divide the body in 10 segments. Postacquisition calculations were done in order to obtain the sagittal net intersegmental moments. To evaluate the differences in intersegmental moments between force and pressure platforms, the postacquisition calculations were done with a simulated pressure platform. Mean intersegmental moments between each body segment for each volunteer were compared. Findings. There were significant differences between the 2 platforms in intersegmental moments for the lumbo-sacral junction, hips, knees, and ankles (p0.005). All differences were inferior to intrasubject variability measured with the force platform (p0.001). Results from intra- and interobserver comparisons showed that differences measured with the pressure platform were all inferior to the standard error obtained with the force platform for every intersegmental moment (p0.001). Interpretation. The use of a simulated pressure platform to determine intersegmental moments has the same clinical efficiency as force platforms. Moreover, the possibility to set the platform into the radiograph room will allow in a second time a correlation between radiographic parameters and biomechanical constraints applied to the spine.
机译:背景。姿势分析的发展由于力量和压力平台,为了确定压力的中心,可以在脊柱恶性的设置中有价值。本研究的目的是比较“压力”和“力”平台,以评估压力中心。换句话说,我们可以在站立姿势期间忽略水平地面反作用力吗?方法。分析了两个健康成人志愿者的姿势数据。根据提供矢状部分时刻的协议进行姿势的分析。使用一组36个标记物在10个段中将身体分成。完成后的时间计算,以获得矢状净的净题名。为了评估力和压力平台之间的主体瞬间的差异,使用模拟压力平台完成的后术价计算。比较每个志愿者的每个车身段之间的平均矩。发现。对于Lumbo-Sacral结,臀部,膝盖和脚踝的三个平台之间的2个平台之间存在显着差异(P <0.005)。所有差异都差不多与用力平台测量的肠道内变异性(P <0.001)。来自和interobserver比较的结果表明,随着压力平台测量的差异都不差不多是用力平台获得每个基体的标准误差(P <0.001)。解释。使用模拟压力平台以确定基石矩具有与力平台相同的临床效率。此外,将平台设置为X光片室的可能性将在第二次允许射线参数和施加到脊柱的生物力学约束之间的相关性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号