首页> 外文期刊>Acta orthopaedica. >Tibial lengthening using a retrograde magnetically driven intramedullary lengthening device in 10 patients with preexisting ankle and hindfoot fusion
【24h】

Tibial lengthening using a retrograde magnetically driven intramedullary lengthening device in 10 patients with preexisting ankle and hindfoot fusion

机译:使用逆行磁力驱动髓内延长装置在10例预先存在的踝和后脚融合术患者中使用逆行磁力驱动的串联延长

获取原文
       

摘要

Background and purpose — Motorized intramedullary lengthening nails (ILNs) have been developed as an alter- native to external fixators for long bone lengthening. The antegrade approach represents the standard method for tibial ILN insertion. In patients with preexisting ankle and hind- foot fusion a retrograde approach provides an alternative technique that has not been evaluated so far. We report the outcome of this method in 10 patients. Patients and methods — This retrospective study included 10 patients (mean age 18 years [13–25]) with pre- existing ankle and hindfoot fusion who underwent tibial lengthening with a retrograde ILN (PRECICE). The mean leg length discrepancy (LLD) was 58 mm (36–80). The underlying conditions were congenital (n = 9) and post tumor resection (n = 1). The main outcome measures were: ILN reliability, distraction achieved, distraction index (DIX), time to bone healing, consolidation index (CIX), complica- tions, and functional results. Results — All patients achieved the goal of lengthening (mean 48 mm [26–80]). Average DIX was 0.6 mm/day (0.5– 0.7) and mean CIX was 44 days/cm (26–60). Delayed con- solidation occurred in 2 patients and healed after ILN dynam- ization or nail exchange with grafting. Toe contractures in 2 other patients were resolved with physiotherapy or tenotomy. Until last follow-up (mean 18 months [12–30]) no true com- plications were encountered, knee motion remained unaf- fected, and full osseous consolidation occurred in all patients. Interpretation — In patients with LLD and preexisting ankle and hindfoot fusion distal tibial lengthening using a ret- rograde ILN is a reliable alternative to the standard approach with equivalent bone healing potential and low complication rates leaving the knee unaffected.
机译:背景和目的 - 已经开发了电动髓内延长指甲(ILNS)作为用于长骨延长的外部固定器的改变。切割方法代表胫骨ILN插入的标准方法。在预先存在的脚踝和后足融合的患者中,逆行方法提供了尚未评估的替代技术。我们在10名患者中报告了这种方法的结果。患者和方法 - 该回顾性研究包括10名患者(平均年龄18岁[13-25]),具有预先存在的踝关节和后脚融合,他用逆行ILN(PRECICE)进行了胫骨延长。平均腿长差异(LLD)为58毫米(36-80)。潜在条件是先天性条件(n = 9)和后肿瘤切除(n = 1)。主要结果措施是:ILN可靠性,分心,分心指数(DIX),骨愈合时间,合并指数(CIX),复杂性和功能结果。结果 - 所有患者均达到延长的目标(平均48 mm [26-80])。平均dix为0.6毫米/天(0.5- 0.7),平均cix为44天/厘米(26-60)。 2例患者发生延迟凝固,并在ILN动态或嫁接后愈合后愈合。 2名其他患者的脚趾挛缩与物理治疗或协调术治疗。直到最后一次随访(平均18个月[12-30])没有遇到真正的粘合剂,膝关节运动仍然没有,所有患者发生了全面的骨整合。解释 - 在LLD和预先存在的踝关节和后脚融合远端胫骨延长使用Ret-Rograde ILN的患者是一种可靠的替代标准方法,具有等效骨愈合潜力和低并发症率,使膝盖不受影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号