首页> 外文期刊>Acta Interna: The Journal of Internal Medicine >The Difference of Depression Score of Patients Failed Ultrafiltration Compared to Successful at Continuous Peritoneal Dialysis Patients in RSUP Dr. Sardjito Yogyakarta
【24h】

The Difference of Depression Score of Patients Failed Ultrafiltration Compared to Successful at Continuous Peritoneal Dialysis Patients in RSUP Dr. Sardjito Yogyakarta

机译:与RSUP博士的连续腹膜透析患者成功,患者抑郁症抑郁症评分的差异失败了萨尔·萨尔·斯塔科塔

获取原文
       

摘要

Background. High mortality and morbidity in patients with Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) are associated with psychological problems and poor quality of life. Depression is a psychological problem most often found in groups of CKD patients undergoing renal replacement therapy. Specific research that links the failure of ultrafiltration in Continuous Ambulatory Peritoneal Dialysis (CAPD) patients with depression does not yet exist today. So that further research is needed regarding this matter so that various depression intervention approaches can be carried out in the group of patients undergoing CAPD.Aims. This study aimed to determine the difference in depressive score of patients who failed ultrafiltration compared to those who did not fail in patients undergoing Continuous Ambulatory Peritoneal Dialysis (CAPD) in RSUP dr. Sardjito Yogyakarta.Method. A cross-sectional analytic study to assess differences in depressive score of CAPD patients with ultrafiltration failure compared to those who did not fail ultrafiltration in CAPD Clinic of RSUP dr. Sardjito Yogyakarta. The research subjects consisted of 41 people who fulfilled the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Depression assessment was carried out by calculating the total score of the BDI-II questionnaire and analyzing it using the Mann-Whitney method.Result. The average value of BDI-II in this study was 12 ± 8. 1. Depression scores based on BDI-II are if the score is equal to or more than 17. In this study 7 research subjects (17.1%) are depression. BDI –II values in the non-ultrafiltration failure group 10.96±7.25 and in the failed group 13.38±9.73 with p= 0.633.Conclusion. There were no significant differences in BDI-II score between groups that failed and those? that did not fail ultrafiltration.
机译:背景。慢性肾病(CKD)患者的高死亡率和发病率与心理问题和生活质量差有关。抑郁症是一种心理问题,通常是在接受肾替代疗法的CKD患者组中发现的。目前尚未存在将超滤失败联系在连续的动态腹膜透析(CAPD)患者中的特定研究尚未存在。因此,需要进一步研究此事,因此可以在接受CAPD.AIMS的患者组中进行各种抑郁症干预方法。该研究旨在确定与在RSUP博士中未持续的车身腹膜透析(CAPD)的患者中没有失败的患者失败的患者抑郁评分的差异。 Sardjito Yogyakarta.method。横截面分析研究,评估超滤失效抑郁症抑郁症患者抑郁症的差异,与RSUP博士的CAPD诊所没有超滤。 Sardjito Yogyakarta。研究科目由41人组成,符合纳入和排斥标准。通过计算BDI-II问卷的总分进行抑郁评估,并使用Mann-Whitney方法分析它。结果。本研究中BDI-II的平均值为12±8. 1.基于BDI-II的抑郁分数是分数等于或超过17.在本研究中,7研究受试者(17.1%)是抑郁症。 BDI -II在非超滤失败组中的值10.96±7.25和故障组13.38±9.73,P = 0.633。结论。在失败和那些的团体之间的BDI-II分数没有显着差异?这并没有超滤。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号