首页> 外文期刊>ABCD. Arquivos Brasileiros de Cirurgia Digestiva (So Paulo) >Ten-years comparative study after surgical treatment of perforated peptic ulcer according to ulcer relapse between H. Pylori positive, after eradication, and negative patients
【24h】

Ten-years comparative study after surgical treatment of perforated peptic ulcer according to ulcer relapse between H. Pylori positive, after eradication, and negative patients

机译:在H. Pylori阳性的溃疡复发,根除后的溃疡复发后穿孔溃疡的手术治疗后的十年比较研究

获取原文
       

摘要

BACKGROUND: The surgical treatment for perforated peptic ulcer is still a matter of discussion. The surgeons, for many years, made their options between acid-reducing procedures with some morbi-mortality and simpler procedures like closure of the perforation. But, in these cases, were faced with a high chance of ulcer relapse. Since the proved link between peptic ulcer and gastroduodenal infection caused by H. pylori, a recommendation for a change in their attitudes going back to simpler procedures with eradication of the bacteria was done. AIM: To analyse ulcer recurrence in patients treated with the same surgical procedure but belonging to two different groups: positive and negative to H. pilori. METHODS: A total of 144 patients were treated with simple closure of their perforated pre-pyloric, pyloric and duodenal ulcers. Thirty days after operation they were submitted to upper endoscopy and tested for the bacteria by urease and histopathological exams and divided into two groups according to the results of the tests: positive and negative. The positive ones were eradicated and, together with the negative group, were followed through six months interval endoscopies and detection tests looking for ulcer relapses and reinfection in the eradicated group. The positive group consisted of 25 patients, with two patients considered non eradicable according to the treatment protocol. They were followed for an average period of 38,21 months. RESULTS: Relapse was detected in four patients (17,39%), half of them (8,69%) were reinfected. The negative group consisted of 26 patients, with a median follow-up of 38,28 months and eight (30,76%) relapses were detected. There was no statistical significant difference due probably to the high dropout of patients. CONCLUSION: Simple suture with H. pilori eradication is the gold standard for the positive group, leaving the question of acid-reducing procedures open for the negative ones.
机译:背景:穿孔消化性溃疡的手术治疗仍然是一个讨论问题。外科医生多年来,通过一些Morbi死亡率和更简单的流程闭合,使其在酸还原程序之间选择。但是,在这些情况下,面临着溃疡复发的很大机会。由于H. Pylori引起的消化性溃疡和胃毒素感染之间的探测链接,因此完成了追溯到易于消除细菌的态度的变化的建议。目的:分析患者患者患者的溃疡复发,但属于两种不同的群体:阳性和阴性对H.Pilori。方法:通过简单地封闭穿孔预幽门,幽门和十二指肠溃疡,共144名患者。手术后30天,它们被提交给上内窥镜检查,并通过脲酶和组织病理学检查测试细菌,并根据试验结果分为两组:阳性和阴性。将阳性物质与阴性组一起消灭,遵循六个月的间隔内窥镜和检测试验,寻找在根除群体中的溃疡复发和再感染。阳性组由25名患者组成,两名患者根据治疗方案审议不可抵抗。他们的平均为38,21个月。结果:在四名患者中检测到复发(17,39%),其中一半(8,69%)重新感染。阴性组由26名患者组成,中位随访38,28个月,未检测到八次(30,76%)。可能对患者的高辍学没有统计显着差异。结论:与H.Pilori根除的简单缝合因素是阳性群体的黄金标准,留下了负面的酸减少手术的问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号