...
首页> 外文期刊>A+BE : Architecture and the Built Environment >Re-use of Building Products in the Netherlands
【24h】

Re-use of Building Products in the Netherlands

机译:在荷兰的建筑产品重新使用

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Over the years, the consumption of materials for construction exceeded more than half of the total materials consumed in the Netherlands, and construction waste exceeded the volume of solid waste produced by households. Since the introduction of the "Ladder van Lansink" (in the 1970’s) and the further development of the European Waste Framework Directives followed by the Circular Economy concept, waste prevention has been considered a priority measure. Whereas the goals to improve waste management towards waste-to-resource and waste elimination evolved from guidelines to political action (throughout the EU), reuse of products remained a less implicit strategy. The reuse of building products is an ancient practice; nonetheless, limited information is available regarding the aspects involved in the existing process. Reuse of building products has seen limited regulatory changes and remained a vague procedure within the resource efficiency discourse in the Netherlands.Building products remain in use for long time spans, which affects the planning and integration of strategies to recover them for reuse. When they are released from buildings (after renovation or demolition) and recovered, these products may not be compatible with new updated technical building requirements, or may not be competitive with upgraded, certified and cheaper new products.The weight, size, and practical challenges to deconstruct buildings are also factors affecting the harvest of such products. Besides these technical and economic aspects, used goods are susceptible to subjective evaluation regarding their "style" and used appearance. Contrary to different forms of waste treatment that transform used products into commodities; used products have intrinsic cultural, historical and aesthetic values influencing their economic value.To foster the integration of industrial activities to promote more efficient use of resources from the anthropogenic environment, it requires a better understanding of the constraints and opportunities among relations within a non-linear economy.This research departs from the desire to understand the practice of reuse of building products from a systemic standpoint, to illuminate its current condition and help to foresee future perspectives.SystemThe holistic approach in this research implies the investigation and representation of a network of multiple factors influencing the process of reusing in analogy to the nature of sustainability as a systemic concept that infers a holistic construction of different conceptual subsets.To perceive the continuity of the strategy of reuse, this research positions the object of study from an evolutionary perspective where relations condition the action of reuse. These relations are dynamic and contextually bounded defining the commercial feasibility of products to be reused rather than wasted.Understanding these relations enables to construct an analytical discourse that takes into consideration a multidisciplinary approach from which different strategies can be designed while contemplating their connectivity.From a pragmatic research tradition, the central research question explored is:What are the perspectives for reuse of building products from the housing stock, given contextual factors that influence the process chain and reserves?The Industrial Ecology concept provides a system’s perspective and the foundation of this study’s methodological framework to answer the main research question. It postulates that the internal relations of the industrial process, as well as relations that go beyond the industrial boundary, are sources of perturbations in the natural system, which is driven by human activities and motivate changes in material and substance flows by demand for services provided by products.Through this systemic perspective, to effectuate reuse of building products in the Netherlands, this research proposes to examine this practice as an industrial ecosystem. It describes the activities; actors and how different factors influence the process of building products' reuse.This research is the result of a collaboration between the Faculty of Industrial Design Engineering and Architecture and the Built environment of TU Delft to construct a multi-scale scope ranging product thinking and regional resource management. The investigation departs from the following assumptions:Reuse of products brings environmental benefits.This study does not evaluate which conditions and what are the environmental benefits of reuse. Nonetheless, the study acknowledges that not one-measure fits all, nor that reuse is the best measure in all contexts. The study departs from the premise established by existing guidelines in waste management and the CE (Circular Economy) concept that waste prevention including reuse should be prioritized.Assessing singular aspects of reuse can lead to limited or partial interpretations, risking future ineffective action plans or their c
机译:多年来,建筑材料的消费超过荷兰消费的总材料的一半以上,建筑废物超过家庭生产的固体废物量。自引进“梯形搬运车兰思连”(在20世纪70年代)和欧洲废物框架指令的进一步发展之后,循环经济概念,废物预防已被视为优先措施。鉴于改善废物管理的浪费资源和废物的目标从政治行动准则(整个欧盟)的准则中发展出来,产品的重用仍然存在较少隐含的策略。建筑产品的重用是一种古老的练习;尽管如此,有关现有流程所涉及的方面的信息可用。重复使用建筑产品的监管变化有限,留在荷兰的资源效率话语中留下了模糊的程序。建筑产品仍在使用中长期跨越,这影响了策略的规划和整合恢复它们以获得重用。当它们从建筑物(装修或拆除后)释放并恢复时,这些产品可能与新的更新的技术建筑要求不兼容,或者可能与升级,认证和更便宜的新产品可能没有竞争力。重量,规模和实际挑战对解构建筑物也是影响这些产品收获的因素。除了这些技术和经济方面,二手商品易于对其“风格”和使用外观的主观评估。与不同形式的废物处理相反,将使用产品转化为商品;二手产品具有内在的文化,历史和审美价值,影响其经济价值。促进工业活动的整合,促进从人为环境中更有效地利用资源,需要更好地了解非线关系中的关系中的制约因素和机遇线性经济。从系统的角度来看,研究了了解了从系统的角度来利用建筑产品的实践,以照亮其当前条件,并有助于预见未来的观点。系统在本研究中的整体方法意味着网络的调查和代表影响与可持续性的性质中的多种因素,以可持续性的性质为流动不同概念集分的整体构建。感知重用策略的连续性,这项研究将研究的对象从进化的角度来看关系条件这一点重用的行动。这些关系是动态和上下文的界限,定义了重复使用的产品的商业可行性而不是浪费。这些关系使得能够构建考虑到多学科方法的分析话语,从而可以在考虑它们的连接时设计不同的策略。从a务实的研究传统,探讨了中央研究问题是:鉴于影响流程链和储备的内容因素,鉴于影响过程链和储备的内容因素,重新利用建筑产品的角度是什么?工业生态概念提供了一个系统的观点和本研究的基础方法论框架要回答主要研究问题。它假设工业过程的内部关系,以及超越工业界限的关系,是自然系统中的扰动的来源,这是由人类活动驱动的,并通过提供的服务需求激励材料和物质流动的变化通过产品。这项研究,通过该系统的角度来实现荷兰的建筑产品的重用,提出将这种做法作为工业生态系统。它描述了活动;演员以及不同的因素如何影响建设产品的重用过程。这项研究是工业设计工程与建筑学院和涂德尔福特建造环境之间的合作,构建多尺度范围的产品思考和区域资源管理。调查从以下假设中止了:重用产品带来了环境效益。这项研究并未评估哪些条件以及重用的环境效益是什么。尽管如此,该研究承认并非一项措施适合所有,也不是重用是所有上下文中的最佳措施。该研究从废物管理和CE(循环经济)的现有准则确定的前提下,即应优先考虑包括重用的废物预防的概念。重用的单个方面可以导致有限或部分解释,冒险未来无效的行动计划或其危险C

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号