...
首页> 外文期刊>Contemporary Clinical Dentistry >Comparative evaluation of the marginal fit of inlays fabricated by conventional and digital impression techniques: A stereomicroscopic study
【24h】

Comparative evaluation of the marginal fit of inlays fabricated by conventional and digital impression techniques: A stereomicroscopic study

机译:常规和数字印象技术制造的镶嵌边缘拟合的比较评价:立体静脉研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Context: Marginal fit being the prime concern of indirect restorations. Inlays can be either fabricated by conventional technique or computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) techniques. CAD/CAM is the most evolving digital technique with faster, quicker, and precise results. Aims: The aim of this study is to evaluate and compare the marginal fit of MOD inlays fabricated with two different CAD/CAM methods and conventional fabrication methods. Settings and Design: Mesio-occlusal-distal preparation was done on a maxillary premolar typhodont tooth and divided into the following groups. Group A: 30 inlays were fabricated through the conventional impression technique. Group B: Preparation was scanning using an intraoral scanner followed by subtractive milling (Group B1) and subtractive milling of wax patterns (Group B2). Similarly, subgrouping was carried out for Group C except that an extraoral scanner was used. Occlusal and the cervical marginal fit were assessed using the replica technique and stereomicroscope. One-way ANOVA followed by Tukey honestly significant difference post hoc test for determining differences at a 95% level of confidence (P = 0.05). Results: Group A had the highest marginal discrepancy in comparison to Group B and Group C at occlusal and cervical edges, whereas subtractive milling showed comparatively better results than subtractive milling of wax patterns at cervical edges and similar results at occlusal edges. Conclusions: Ceramic inlays fabricated by subtractive milling yielded better results.
机译:背景:边缘适合是间接修复的主要关注。嵌体可以通过传统技术或计算机辅助设计和计算机辅助制造(CAD / CAM)技术来制造。 CAD / CAM是最不断变化的数字技术,更快,更快,结果精确。目的:本研究的目的是评估和比较用两种不同的CAD / CAM方法和常规制造方法制造的MOD嵌体的边缘配合。设置和设计:Mesio-occlusal-远端制剂在上颌前牙耳牙齿上进行,分为以下基团。 A组:30镶嵌通过传统的印模技术制造。 B组:使用内部扫描仪扫描扫描后,然后用减法研磨(组B1)和减肥研磨(组B2组)。类似地,除了使用体外扫描仪之外,对组进行分组。使用复制品和立体显微镜评估咬合和宫颈边际拟合。单向ANOVA,然后是Tukey诚实的显着差异,HOC测试差异为95%的信心水平(P = 0.05)。结果:A组与咬合和颈边的B组和C组和C组具有最高的边际差异,而减法研磨比在宫颈边缘处的蜡模式的减去磨削的结果相对较好,并且在咬合边缘的类似结果。结论:通过减肥研磨制造的陶瓷嵌体产生了更好的结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号