...
首页> 外文期刊>Conflict and Health >Measurement invariance of the Hopkins Symptoms Checklist: a novel multigroup alignment analytic approach to a large epidemiological sample across eight conflict-affected districts from a nation-wide survey in Sri Lanka
【24h】

Measurement invariance of the Hopkins Symptoms Checklist: a novel multigroup alignment analytic approach to a large epidemiological sample across eight conflict-affected districts from a nation-wide survey in Sri Lanka

机译:Hopkins的测量不变性症状清单:从斯里兰卡全国范围内调查的八个冲突影响地区跨越八个冲突影响地区的大型流行病学样本的新型多组对准分析方法

获取原文
           

摘要

The alignment method, a novel psychometric approach, represents a more flexible procedure for establishing measurement invariance in geographically, ethnically, or linguistically diverse samples, especially in large epidemiological surveys. Although the Hopkins Symptoms Checklist (HSCL-25) has been used extensively in the field to assess anxiety and depressive symptoms, questions remain about the comparability of findings when the instrument is applied across regions in large-scale national surveys. The present study is the first in the field to apply the alignment method to test the structure and measurement invariance of the anxiety and depression dimensions of the HSCL-25 amongst Sri Lankan subpopulations (n?=?8456) stratified by geographical regions, levels of past exposure to conflict, and ethnic composition. Multigroup CFA analysis yielded non-converging models requiring substantial modifications to the models. As a result, multigroup alignment analysis was applied and the results supported the bifactorial structure and measurement invariance of the HSCL-25 across eight (severe and moderate) conflict-affected districts. The alignment analysis based on a good-fitting configural model yielded a metric non-invariance of 22.22% and scalar non-invariance of 5.88% (both under the established 25% threshold). The bifactorial model outperformed the tripartite and other models. In comparison to the anxiety items, the depressive items showed higher levels of metric non-invariance across districts. Our findings demonstrate the methodological feasibility of applying the alignment method to test the structure and invariance of the HSCL across ethnically diverse populations living in conflict-affected districts in Sri Lanka. Further studies are needed to examine ethnicity and language factors more critically.
机译:对准方法是一种新的心理测量方法,代表了用于在地理上,种族或语言或语言上不同的样本中建立测量不变性的更灵活的过程,特别是在大型流行病学调查中。虽然霍普金斯症状清单(HSCL-25)已被广泛用于现场用于评估焦虑和抑郁症状,但仍然存在关于在大规模国家调查中的地区应用仪器时的结果的可比性。本研究是本领域的第一个应用对准方法,以测试由地理区域分层的SRI Lankan群(N?= 10456)中HSCL-25的焦虑和抑郁尺寸的结构和测量不变性过去接触冲突和民族构成。 MultiStoup CFA分析产生了不收敛模型,需要对模型进行大量修改。结果,应用了MultiGroup对准分析,结果支持了HSCL-25跨越八个(严重和中等)冲突地区的BIFactoral结构和测量不变性。基于拟合配置模型的对准分析产生了22.22%的度量不变性,标量不受同样为5.88%(均在已建立的25%阈值下)。 Bifactoral模型优于三方和其他型号。与焦虑物品相比,抑郁项在地区展示了更高水平的公制非不变性。我们的研究结果证明了应用对准方法的方法,以测试HSCL跨斯里兰卡冲突地区的种族各种人群的群体不同人群的结构和不变性。需要进一步的研究来更加重大地审查种族和语言因素。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号