首页> 外文期刊>Clinical Neuropsychiatry: Journal Of Treatments Evaluation >A SEMI STRUCTURED, PHENOMENOLOGICALLY-ORIENTED PSYCHIATRIC INTERVIEW: DESCRIPTIVE CONGRUENCE IN ASSESSING ANOMALOUS SUBJECTIVE EXPERIENCE AND MENTAL STATUS
【24h】

A SEMI STRUCTURED, PHENOMENOLOGICALLY-ORIENTED PSYCHIATRIC INTERVIEW: DESCRIPTIVE CONGRUENCE IN ASSESSING ANOMALOUS SUBJECTIVE EXPERIENCE AND MENTAL STATUS

机译:半结构化的,现象学的精神科学访谈:在评估异常主观经验和精神状态方面的描述一致

获取原文
           

摘要

Objective: The contemporary methodology in obtaining psychopathological information relies almost exclusively on the use of structured questionnaires and interview schedules. These interviews yield high interrater reliability and reduce cost. The assessments of anomalous self-experience and of mental status (disorders of experience and expression) are often considered as soft, subjective and hence unreliable. In spite of the advantages of the structured interviews, concerns have been raised about the epistemological coherence and the validity of the structured interviews. To examine the interrater congruens between experienced clinicians with a semi structured, phenomenologically oriented psychopathological interview assessing anomalous self-experience and mental status. Method: Seventeen inpatients were interviewed by one of the raters, with both raters were present. The interview comprised of a thorough psychosocial history and the EASE?Cscale. Results: The interater-congruens for the total EASE-scale showed nearly perfect agreement with kappa=0.94. The interrater-reliablility for the MSE assessment showed substantial to complete agreement with kappa above 0.81, except for four items: Withdrawn/shy (kappa=0.77), Suspicious, guarded and hostile (kappa=0.77), Raport insecure and anxious (kappa=0.76), Restless (kappa=0.64). Conclusions: High interrater-congruens can be achieved for the assessment of anomalous self-experience and mental status in the context of conversational, phenomenological-oriented semi-structured interview. Limitations: The major limitation of the study is a relatively small sample size, conditioned by the time-consuming nature of the individual interviews. Second, we should have included a measurement of reliability in a less experienced- recently EASE-introduced rater, since it is that kind of researchers that are typically enrolled for the empirical data collections.
机译:目的:获得精神病理学信息的当代方法几乎完全依赖于使用结构化问卷和访谈时间表。这些面试产生高的Interray可靠性并降低成本。异常自我体验和精神状态(经验和表达障碍)的评估通常被认为是柔软的,主观的,因此不可靠。尽管结构化访谈的优势,但已经提出了关注的认识论一致性以及结构化访谈的有效性。检查有经验丰富的临床医生之间的Interriter Conluens,具有半结构化,现象学前面向的精神病理学访谈评估异常的自我经验和精神状态。方法:17名住院患者受到其中一位评估者的访谈,两种评估者都存在。采访包括彻底的心理社会历史和轻松的人。结果:对于总容易级别的交流甘蔗队与kappa = 0.94表示近乎完美的协议。用于MSE评估的中等内部接纳性促使与kappa以上达成0.81以上的达成绩,除了四项:撤销/害羞(kappa = 0.77),可疑,守卫和敌对(kappa = 0.77),雄鹿不安全和焦虑(kappa = 0.76),焦躁不安(Kappa = 0.64)。结论:在会话,现象主义的半结构化访谈中,可以实现高度中间人 - 同时进行评估,以评估异常的自我经验和精神状态。局限性:研究的主要限制是一个相对较小的样本大小,由个人访谈的耗时性质调节。其次,我们应该在较不经验丰富的令人轻松引入的评估者中包含可靠性的测量,因为它是那种通常注册经验数据收集的研究人员。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号