...
首页> 外文期刊>Clinical Interventions in Aging >Shock Waves as a Treatment Modality for Spasticity Reduction and Recovery Improvement in Post-Stroke Adults – Current Evidence and Qualitative Systematic Review
【24h】

Shock Waves as a Treatment Modality for Spasticity Reduction and Recovery Improvement in Post-Stroke Adults – Current Evidence and Qualitative Systematic Review

机译:冲击波作为痉挛性降低和恢复改善后卒中后成年人的治疗方式 - 当前证据和定性系统审查

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Purpose: This systematic review examines intervention studies using extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) application in post-stroke muscle spasticity with particular emphasis on the comparison of two different types of radial (rESWT) and focused shock waves (fESWT). Methods: PubMed, PEDro, Scopus, and EBSCOhost databases were systematically searched. Studies published between the years 2000 and 2019 in the impact factor journals and available in the English full-text version were eligible for inclusion. All qualified articles were classified in terms of their scientific reliability and methodological quality using the PEDro criteria. The PRISMA guidelines were followed and the registration on the PROSPERO database was done. Results: A total of 17 articles were reviewed of a total sample of 303 patients (age: 57.87±10.45 years and duration of stroke: 40.49±25.63 months) who were treated with ESWT. Recent data confirm both a subjective (spasticity, pain, and functioning) and objective (range of motion, postural control, muscular endurance, muscle tone, and muscle elasticity) improvements for post-stroke spasticity. The mean difference showing clinical improvement was: ?=34.45% of grade for fESWT and ?=34.97% for rESWT that gives a slightly better effect of rESWT (?=0.52%) for spasticity (p0.05), and ?=38.83% of angular degrees for fESWT and ?=32.26% for rESWT that determines the more beneficial effect of fESWT (?=6.57%) for range of motion (p0.05), and ?=18.32% for fESWT and ?=22.27% for rESWT that gives a slightly better effect of rESWT (?=3.95%) for alpha motor neuron excitability (p0.05). The mean PEDro score was 4.70±2.5 points for fESWT and 5.71±2.21 points for rESWT, thus an overall quality of evidence grade of moderate (“fair” for fESWT and “good” for rESWT). Three studies in fESWT and four in rESWT obtained Sackett’s grading system’s highest Level 1 of evidence. Conclusion: The studies affirm the effectiveness of ESWT in reducing muscle spasticity and improving motor recovery after stroke.
机译:目的:这种系统审查检查使用体外冲击波治疗(ESWT)在卒中后肌痉挛中的干预研究,特别强调了两种不同类型的径向(RESWT)和聚焦冲击波(FESWT)的比较。方法:系统地搜索PUBMED,PEDRO,SCOPUS和EBSCOHOST数据库。 2000年和2019年在影响因素期刊上发表的研究,英国全文版本有资格包含。所有合格的文章都以使用佩德罗标准的科学可靠性和方法质量分类。遵循PRISMA指南,并完成了Prospero数据库的注册。结果:综述了17篇文章的303名患者样品(年龄:57.87±10.45岁及时间持续时间:40.49±25.63个月),他被ESWT治疗。最近的数据证实了主观(痉挛性,疼痛和运作)和目标(运动范围,姿势控制,肌肉耐久性,肌肉色调,肌肉弹性)的改善,对后冲击性痉挛改善。显示临床改善的平均差异是:?= FeSWT等级的34.45%,= 34.97%,痉挛的RESWT(= 0.52%)略微好转(P <0.05),= 38.83% feswt的角度度和α= 32.26%,用于确定feswt(= 6.57%)的运动范围(p <0.05),= feswt的= 18.32%,= 22.27%的reswt这给予α电机神经元兴奋性的RESWT(= 3.95%)略微好转(P <0.05)。 FESWT的平均佩德罗评分为4.70±2.5点,reswt为5.71±2.21点,因此为FESWT的中等(“公平”和“良好”为RES的总体质量。 FESWT的三项研究和四个在RESWT中获得了Sackett的评分系统的最高级别证据。结论:研究肯定了ESWT在降低肌痉挛和提高中风恢复的情况下的有效性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号