...
首页> 外文期刊>Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health >Psychiatrists' attitudes towards autonomy, best interests and compulsory treatment in anorexia nervosa: a questionnaire survey
【24h】

Psychiatrists' attitudes towards autonomy, best interests and compulsory treatment in anorexia nervosa: a questionnaire survey

机译:精神科医生对Anorexia Nervosa的自治,最佳利益和强制治疗的态度:调查问卷调查

获取原文
           

摘要

Background The compulsory treatment of anorexia nervosa is a contentious issue. Research suggests that psychiatrists have a range of attitudes towards patients suffering from anorexia nervosa, and towards the use of compulsory treatment for the disorder. Methods A postal self-completed attitudinal questionnaire was sent to senior psychiatrists in the United Kingdom who were mostly general adult psychiatrists, child and adolescent psychiatrists, or psychiatrists with an interest in eating disorders. Results Respondents generally supported a role for compulsory measures under mental health legislation in the treatment of patients with anorexia nervosa. Compared to 'mild' anorexia nervosa, respondents generally were less likely to feel that patients with 'severe' anorexia nervosa were intentionally engaging in weight loss behaviours, were able to control their behaviours, wanted to get better, or were able to reason properly. However, eating disorder specialists were less likely than other psychiatrists to think that patients with 'mild' anorexia nervosa were choosing to engage in their behaviours or able to control their behaviours. Child and adolescent psychiatrists were more likely to have a positive view of the use of parental consent and compulsory treatment for an adolescent with anorexia nervosa. Three factors emerged from factor analysis of the responses named: 'Support for the powers of the Mental Health Act to protect from harm'; 'Primacy of best interests'; and 'Autonomy viewed as being preserved in anorexia nervosa'. Different scores on these factor scales were given in terms of type of specialist and gender. Conclusion In general, senior psychiatrists tend to support the use of compulsory treatment to protect the health of patients at risk and also to protect the welfare of patients in their best interests. In particular, eating disorder specialists tend to support the compulsory treatment of patients with anorexia nervosa independently of views about their decision-making capacity, while child and adolescent psychiatrists tend to support the treatment of patients with anorexia nervosa in their best interests where decision-making is impaired.
机译:背景技术厌食症的强制性治疗是一种有争议的问题。研究表明,精神科医生对患有厌食症患者的患者以及对这种疾病使用的强制治疗有一系列态度。方法邮政自我完成的态度问卷被送到英国的高级精神科医生,主要是一般成人精神病学家,儿童和青少年精神病学家,或对饮食障碍有兴趣的精神科医生。结果受访者普遍支持在厌食症患者治疗心理健康立法下的强制措施的作用。与“轻度”厌食症神经组织相比,受访者通常不太可能觉得“严重”的厌食症神经患者有意地参与体重减轻行为,能够控制他们的行为,想要变得更好,或者能够正确理智。然而,饮食障碍专家比其他精神科医生不太可能认为患有“轻度”厌食症神经系统的患者选择从事他们的行为或能够控制他们的行为。儿童和青少年精神病学家更有可能对使用患有厌食症的青少年的父母同意和强制性处理的积极观点。从因素分析出来的三个因素被评为:'支持伤害伤害的心理健康行为的权力'; “最佳利益的最初”;并且“自治被认为被保存在厌食症中”。在专业和性别类型方面给出了这些因子秤上的不同评分。结论一般来说,高级精神科医生倾向于支持使用强制性处理,保护患者健康的风险,并以其最佳利益保护患者的福利。特别是,饮食障碍专家倾向于支持厌食症神经患者的强制治疗,独立于其决策能力,而孩子和青少年精神病学家倾向于支持厌食症神经患者的患者,以其最佳的决策兴趣受损。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号