...
首页> 外文期刊>Cardiology Research >Expedited Removal of a Radial Hemostatic Compression Device Following Cardiac Catheterization Is Safe and Associated With Reduced Time to Discharge
【24h】

Expedited Removal of a Radial Hemostatic Compression Device Following Cardiac Catheterization Is Safe and Associated With Reduced Time to Discharge

机译:快速去除心脏导管插入后的径向止血压缩装置是安全的,并且与降低的排出时间有关

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: Radial access for cardiac catheterization has become increasingly adopted, owing much of its popularity to decreased bleeding complications compared with the femoral approach. Hemostatic compression devices (HCDs) for radial catheterization play a key role in this advantage, but the optimal duration of compression is unknown. A shorter duration of compression is encouraged by guidelines, but removing an HCD too quickly could result in serious bleeding. We aimed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of expedited removal of a radial HCD after cardiac catheterization.Methods: We conducted a prospective study of patients undergoing radial cardiac catheterization and/or percutaneous coronary intervention at a tertiary care academic medical center. Patients underwent HCD application using a TR Band? (Terumo Interventional Systems) which was removed after a prespecified amount of time in each of three sequential temporal cohorts: 2-h, 1-h, or 0.5-h. Each patient was monitored for development of bleeding or hematoma and for serious complications.Results: A total of 354 patients participated in our study, with similar numbers in each group. There was a greater rate of minor bleeding in the 0.5-h (12%) and 1-h (19%) groups compared with the 2-h group (8%), but there were no serious complications (need for surgical consultation, transfusion, or unplanned admission) in any group. The average time to discharge was shorter in the 0.5-h and 1-h groups compared with the 2-h group.Conclusions: Deflating the radial HCD at 0.5 h is safe with no increase in the observed rate of major complications and is associated with reduced time to discharge after coronary angiography or percutaneous coronary intervention using the radial arterial approach.
机译:背景:心脏导管插入件的径向进入越来越多地采用,与股本方法相比,其普及降低出血并发症。用于径向导管插入件的止血压缩装置(HCD)在这种优势中发挥着关键作用,但是压缩的最佳持续时间是未知的。准则鼓励较短的压缩持续时间,但删除HCD太快可能导致严重出血。我们的旨在评估心脏导管术后加速除去径向HCD的安全性和有效性。方法:我们对在高等教育学术医疗中心进行了桡骨心导管插入症和/或经皮冠状动脉干预的患者进行了前瞻性研究。患者使用TR频段接受HCD申请吗? (Terumo介入系统)在三个顺序时间队列中的每一个中的预先确定的时间后被除去:2-H,1-H或0.5-h。监测每位患者的出血或血肿和严重并发症的发育。结果:我们的研究共参加354名患者,每组中有类似的数字。与2-H组(8%)相比,0.5小时(12%)和1小时(19%)组中的小速度较小,但没有严重的并发症(需要外科咨询,在任何组中输血或无计划的入院。与2-H族相比,0.5-H和1-H组的平均排出时间短。结论:使径向HCD在0.5小时下是安全的,没有增加的主要并发症率并与之相关使用径向动脉方法减少冠状动脉血管造影或经皮冠状动脉介入后放电的时间。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号