首页> 外文期刊>BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth >Mapping the trajectories for women and their babies from births planned at home, in a birth centre or in a hospital in New South Wales, Australia, between 2000 and 2012
【24h】

Mapping the trajectories for women and their babies from births planned at home, in a birth centre or in a hospital in New South Wales, Australia, between 2000 and 2012

机译:将妇女和他们的婴儿的营地从澳大利亚新的南威尔士州新南威尔士州,2000年至2012年间映射妇女和他们的婴儿

获取原文
       

摘要

BACKGROUND:In New South Wales (NSW) Australia, women at low risk of complications can choose from three birth settings: home, birth centre and hospital. Between 2000 and 2012, around 6.4% of pregnant women planned to give birth in a birth centre (6%) or at home (0.4%) and 93.6% of women planned to birth in a hospital. A proportion of the woman in the home and birth centre groups transferred to hospital. However, their pathways or trajectories are largely unknown.AIM:The aim was to map the trajectories and interventions experienced by women and their babies from births planned at home, in a birth centre or in a hospital over a 13-year period in NSW.METHODS:Using population-based linked datasets from NSW, women at low risk of complications, with singleton pregnancies, gestation 37-41 completed weeks and spontaneous onset of labour were included. We used a decision tree framework to depict the trajectories of these women and estimate the probabilities of the following: giving birth in their planned setting; being transferred; requiring interventions and neonatal admission to higher level hospital care. The trajectories were analysed by parity.RESULTS:Over a 13-year period, 23% of nulliparous and 0.8% of multiparous women planning a home birth were transferred to hospital. In the birth centre group, 34% of nulliparae and 12% of multiparas were transferred to a hospital. Normal vaginal birth rates were higher in multiparous women compared to nulliparous women in all settings. Neonatal admission to SCN/NICU was highest in the planned hospital group for nulliparous women (10.1%), 7.1% for nulliparous women planning a birth centre birth and 5.1% of nulliparous women planning a homebirth. Multiparas had lower admissions to SCN/NICU for all thee settings (hospital 6.3%, BC 3.6%, home 1.6%, respectively).CONCLUSIONS:Women who plan to give birth at home or in a birth centre have high rates of vaginal birth, even when transferred to hospital. Evidence on the trajectories of women who choose to give birth at home or in birth centres will assist the planning, costing and expansion of models of care in NSW.
机译:背景:在新的南威尔士州(新南威尔士州)澳大利亚,女性低于并发症风险的风险可供选择:家庭,出生中心和医院。在2000年至2012年期间,计划计划在出生中心(6%)或在家(0.4%)和93.6%计划在医院出生的孕妇出生。家庭和出生中心团体的比例转移到医院。然而,他们的途径或轨迹在很大程度上是未知的。目的是将妇女和他们的婴儿从在家中或在新南威尔士州的13年期间映射妇女和他们的婴儿所经历的轨迹和干预措施。方法:采用新南威尔士州的基于人口的联系数据集,妇女低于并发症的风险,妊娠37-41周期,包括周数和劳动力的自发发作。我们使用了决策树框架来描绘这些女性的轨迹并估计以下概率:在计划环境中分娩;转移;要求干预和新生儿入院到更高级别的医院护理。通过平价分析轨迹。结果:超过13年的时间,将23%的无数妇女的少数妇女占总出分娩的0.8%被转移到医院。在出生中心组中,34%的无脂素和12%的多马拉斯转移到医院。与所有环境中的无流动女性相比,多体妇女的阴道出生率较高。新生儿进入SCN / NICU在计划医院组中最高,用于乏味妇女(10.1%),抑制出生的妇女的含量为7.1%,计划出生的妇女出生,5.1%的无污染妇女计划分娩。 Multiparas为SCN / Nicu提供了较低的所有设置(医院6.3%,BC 3.6%,7.6%,分别为7.6%)。Conclusions:计划在家里或出生中心出生的女性具有高阴道分娩,即使转移到医院。关于选择在家或出生中心出生的妇女轨迹的证据将协助新南威尔士州护理模式的规划,成本化和扩展。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号