...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Nephrology >Incidence, timing and outcome of AKI in critically ill patients varies with the definition used and the addition of urine output criteria
【24h】

Incidence, timing and outcome of AKI in critically ill patients varies with the definition used and the addition of urine output criteria

机译:AKI在重症病患者中的发病率,时序和结果随着所用的定义和添加尿量标准而变化

获取原文

摘要

Background Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a serious complication of critical illness with both attributed morbidity and mortality at short-term and long-term. The incidence of AKI reported in critically ill patients varies substantially with the population evaluated and the definitions used. We aimed to assess which of the AKI definitions (RIFLE, AKIN or KDIGO) with or without urine output criteria recognizes AKI most frequently and quickest. Additionally, we conducted a review on the comparison of incidence proportions of varying AKI definitions in populations of critically ill patients. Methods We included all patients with index admissions to our intensive care unit (ICU) from January 1st, 2014 until June 11th, 2014 to determine the incidence and onset of AKI by RIFLE, AKIN and KDIGO during the first 7?days of ICU admission. We conducted a sensitive search using PubMed evaluating the comparison of RIFLE, AKIN and KDIGO in critically ill patients Results AKI incidence proportions were 15, 21 and 20% respectively using serum creatinine criteria of RIFLE, AKIN and KDIGO. Adding urine output criteria increased AKI incidence proportions to 35, 38 and 38% using RIFLE, AKIN and KDIGO definitions. Urine output criteria detected AKI in patients without AKI at ICU admission in a median of 13?h (IQR 7–22 h; using RIFLE definition) after admission compared to a median of 24?h using serum creatinine criteria (IQR24-48 h). In the literature a large heterogeneity exists in patients included, AKI definition used, reference or baseline serum creatinine used, and whether urine output in the staging of AKI is used. Conclusion AKIN and KDIGO criteria detect more patients with AKI compared to RIFLE criteria. Addition of urine output criteria detect patients with AKI 11?h earlier than serum creatinine criteria and may double AKI incidences in critically ill patients. This could explain the large heterogeneity observed in literature.
机译:背景技术急性肾损伤(AKI)是严重并发症,其患有归因于归因于短期和长期性发病率和死亡率。在危险性患者中报告的AKI发病率大大变化,群体评估和使用的定义。我们的目标是评估其中的AKI定义(步枪,Akin或Kdigo),没有尿量输出标准识别AKI最常见和最快。此外,我们还对危重患者群体的不同AKI定义的发生率比较进行了综述。方法包括从1月1日1日1月1日至6月11日到6月11日的重症监护室(ICU)指数录取的所有患者,直到6月11日 th ,2014,以确定aki的发病率和发作通过步枪,Akin和Kdigo在前7天的ICU入学期间。我们使用PubMed评估步枪的比较进行了一个敏感的搜索,Akin和Kdigo在重症病患者中,结果分别使用血清肌酐,akin和kdigo的血清肌酐标准分别为15,21和20%。添加尿液输出标准使用步枪,类似牛皮和KDIGO定义增加AKI发病率比35,38和38%。尿液输出标准检测到在13°(IQR 7-22 H;使用步枪定义的中位数的ICU入院患者中检测到AKI的患者在使用血清肌酸酐标准(IQR24-48 H)中的24次中位数(IQR 7-22 H;使用步枪定义) 。在文献中,包括的患者存在大的异质性,所用的AKI定义,使用的参考或基线血清肌酐,以及是否使用了AKI的分期中的尿液输出。结论与步枪标准相比,Akin和Kdigo标准检测更多Aki患者。尿液输出标准的添加比血清肌酐标准早于血清肌酸酐标准的患者,并且可能在危重病患者中双重炎症发生。这可以解释文献中观察到的大异质性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号