...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Nephrology >A comparison of temporal artery thermometers with internal blood monitors to measure body temperature during hemodialysis
【24h】

A comparison of temporal artery thermometers with internal blood monitors to measure body temperature during hemodialysis

机译:颞型血液监测器颞动脉温度计测量血液透析期间体温的比较

获取原文
           

摘要

Thermometers that measure core (internal) body temperature are the gold standard for monitoring temperature. Despite that most modern hemodialysis machines are equipped with an internal blood monitor that measures core body temperature, current practice is to use peripheral thermometers. A better understanding of how peripheral thermometers compare with the dialysis machine thermometer may help guide practice. The study followed a prospective cross-sectional design. Hemodialysis patients were recruited from 2 sites in Calgary, Alberta (April – June 2017). Body temperatures were obtained from peripheral (temporal artery) and dialysis machine thermometers concurrently. Paired t-tests, Bland-Altman plots, and quantile-quantile plots were used to compare measurements from the two devices and to explore potential factors affecting temperature in hemodialysis patients. The mean body temperature of 94 hemodialysis patients measured using the temporal artery thermometer (36.7?°C) was significantly different than the dialysis machine thermometer (36.4?°C); p?
机译:测量核心(内部)体温的温度计是监测温度的金标准。尽管大多数现代血液透析机器都配备了核心体温的内部血迹,但目前的实践是使用外围温度计。更好地了解外围温度计与透析机温度计的比较如何有助于指导实践。该研究遵循了预期横截面设计。血液透析患者是艾伯塔卡尔加里的2个地点招募的血液透析患者(2017年4月)。体温同时从外周(颞动脉)和透析机温度计。配对的T检验,平坦的T-Altman图和分位式量码图用于比较两种器件的测量并探讨影响血液透析患者温度的潜在因素。使用时间动脉温度计(36.7Ω·℃)测量的94例血液透析患者的平均体温显着不同于透析机温度计(36.4°C); p?<?0.001。平均差异(0.27Ω·℃)似乎在平均气温(范围:35.8-37.3Ω·°C)一致。颞动脉温度计测量的温度在统计上和临床上高于透析机温度计测量的温度。使用透析机来监测体温可能会导致更准确的读数,并且可能降低与手动温度读数相关的采购和维护成本,并缓解透析工作人员的工作量。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号