首页> 外文期刊>BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders >One-stage posterior debridement, bone grafting fusion, and mono-segment vs. short-segment fixation for single-segment lumbar spinal tuberculosis: minimum 5-year follow-up outcomes
【24h】

One-stage posterior debridement, bone grafting fusion, and mono-segment vs. short-segment fixation for single-segment lumbar spinal tuberculosis: minimum 5-year follow-up outcomes

机译:单阶段后排放,骨移植融合和单段与单段腰椎结核的短段固定:最低5年的后续结果

获取原文
           

摘要

To compare the clinical and radiological outcomes between posterior mono-segment and short-segment fixation combined with one-stage posterior debridement and bone grafting fusion in treating single-segment lumbar spinal tuberculosis (LSTB). Sixty-two patients with single-segment LSTB treated by a posterior-only approach were divided into two groups: short-segment fixation (Group A, n?=?32) and mono-segment fixation (Group B, n?=?30). The clinical and radiographic outcomes were analyzed and compared between the two groups. The intraoperative bleeding volume, operation time, and hospitalization duration were lower in Group B than in Group A. All patients achieved the bony fusion criteria. The visual analog scale score, Japanese Orthopedic Association score, and Oswestry Disability Index were substantially improved 3?months postoperatively and at the last visit in both groups, with no significant difference between the two groups (P??0.05). Kirkaldy–Willis functional evaluation at the final follow-up demonstrated that all patients in both groups achieved excellent or good results. The difference in the angle correction rate and correction loss between Groups A and B was not significant (P??0.05). One-stage posterior debridement, bone grafting fusion, and mono-segment or short-segment fixation can provide satisfactory clinical and radiological outcomes. Mono-segment fixation is more suitable for the treatment of single-segment LSTB because the lumbar segments with normal motion can be preserved with less trauma, a shorter operation time, shorter hospitalization, and lower costs.
机译:比较后段和短段固定与单阶段后清创和骨移植融合在治疗单段腰椎结核(LSTB)中的临床和放射性结合。六十二次通过唯一唯一方法处理的单段LSTB患者分为两组:短段固定(A组,N?= 32)和单段固定(B组,N?= 30 )。分析临床和放射线摄影结果并在两组之间进行比较。 B组术中出血体积,操作时间和住院持续时间均低于A组。所有患者都达到了骨融合标准。视觉模拟规模得分,日本整形性关联评分和疏野残疾指数在术后3次和oswestry残疾指数术后3个月,两组之间的最后一次访问,两组之间没有显着差异(P?> 0.05)。 kirkaldy-willis在最终随访中的功能评估表明,两组的所有患者都取得了良好或良好的效果。 A和B组之间的角度校正率和校正损失的差异不显着(P?>?0.05)。单阶段后清创,骨移植融合和单段或短段固定可以提供令人满意的临床和放射性结果。单段固定更适合于处理单段LstB,因为具有正常运动的腰部段可以保存较少的创伤,较短的操作时间,较短的住院,以及降低成本。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号