首页> 外文期刊>BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders >Comparison of the efficacy and safety profiles of a pelubiprofen versus celecoxib in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a 6-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, phase III, non-inferiority clinical trial
【24h】

Comparison of the efficacy and safety profiles of a pelubiprofen versus celecoxib in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a 6-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, phase III, non-inferiority clinical trial

机译:对类风湿性关节炎患者的Pelubiprofof of对Celecoxib的疗效和安全谱的比较:6周,多中心,随机,双盲,III期,非劣级临床试验

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Pelubiprofen is a prodrug of 2-arylpropionic acid with relatively selective effects on cyclooxygenase-2 activity. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety profiles of pelubiprofen with those of celecoxib in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. This was a 6-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group, phase III, non-inferiority clinical trial. The primary end point was non-inferiority of pain decrease from baseline to week-6 as determined using a 100?mm pain visual analog scale (VAS). Pelubiprofen was considered non-inferior to celecoxib if the lower limit of the 97.5% confidence interval for treatment difference [(pain reduction in pelubiprofen group) – (pain reduction in celecoxib group)] was more than ?10?mm. The secondary end points were as follows: non-inferiority of (1) reduction of Korean health assessment questionnaire (KHAQ) score; (2) decreased duration of morning stiffness; and (3) decrease in the frequency and total dose of rescue drugs after 6?weeks of treatment. Seventy-seven patients in the pelubiprofen group and 68 patients in the celecoxib group started the study medication. Pelubiprofen was non-inferior to celecoxib with regard to reduction in VAS pain severity (difference, mean?±?SD 5.0?±?20.1; 97.5% CI, ?2.3 to ∞). Pelubiprofen was also non-inferior to celecoxib in terms of the secondary end points, such as, decrease in KHAQ score (0.0?±?0.5, 97.5% CI ?0.2 to ∞), decrease in duration of morning stiffness (median 0.0?minute in both groups), and decrease in the frequency (0.7?±?3.5, 97.5% CI ?0.6 to ∞) and total amount (0.7?±?3.6, 97.5% CI ?0.6 to ∞) of rescue medication uses during the 6?week study period. Safety analysis revealed 31.2% patients in the pelubiprofen group and 20.6% patients in the celecoxib group experienced an adverse drug reaction (ADR). The frequency of gastrointestinal ADRs was 20.8 % and 8.8%, respectively. Pelubiprofen was found to be as effective as celecoxib at pain reduction and for relieving stiffness in RA patients. However, more patients in the pelubiprofen group experienced ADR and the frequency of gastrointestinal ADRs was higher in the pelubiprofen group. ClinialTrials.gov identifier: NCT01781702.
机译:Pelubiprofen是2-芳基丙酸的前药,对环加氧基酶-2活性相对选择性作用。本研究的目的是将Pelubiprofof的疗效和安全性与类风湿性关节炎患者的Celecoxib进行比较。这是6周,多中心,随机,双盲,双伪,并联,第三阶段,非劣级临床试验。使用100μmam疼痛视觉模拟量表(VAS)测定,主要终点从基线到周-6的疼痛减少。如果97.5%置信区间隔的下限[(骨盆乙烯组的疼痛减少)的下限,PELUBIPROFEN被认为是非较低的塞克西布 - (粘蛋白基团的疼痛减少)]大于α10Ωmm。次要目的如下:(1)减少韩国健康评估问卷(Khaq)得分; (2)减少早晨僵硬的持续时间; (3)在6个疗法后,救援药物的频率和总剂量减少。七十七名患者在Pelubiprofen组和68名患者中塞列昔布集团开始研究药物。 Pelubiprofof是关于塞克西布的不逊色于VAS疼痛严重程度(差异,平均值?±α_D5.0?±20.1; 97.5%CI,?2.3至∞)。在次要终点的方面,Pelubiprofen也不是Celecoxib,例如,Khaq评分的减少(0.0?±0.5,97.5%CI〜0.2至∞),持续时间减少(中位数0.0?分钟在两个组中),并降低频率(0.7?±3.5,97.5%CI→0.6至∞)和救援药物期间使用的总量(0.7?±3.6,97.5%CI→0.6至∞) ?一周的研究期。安全性分析揭示了31.2%的骨盆组患者,20.6%的Celecoxib组患者经历了不良药物反应(ADR)。胃肠道ADR的频率分别为20.8%和8.8%。发现Pelubiprofen在疼痛减少和缓解RA患者的僵硬时,如塞押昔芬。然而,在PelubiProfen组中的更多患者经历了ADR和胃肠道ADR的频率在pelubiprofof rOf组中较高。 ClinialTrials.gov标识符:NCT01781702。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号