首页> 外文期刊>BioMedical Engineering OnLine >Relationship of short-term blood pressure variability with carotid intima-media thickness in hypertensive patients
【24h】

Relationship of short-term blood pressure variability with carotid intima-media thickness in hypertensive patients

机译:高血压患者颈动脉内膜厚度的短期血压变异性

获取原文
           

摘要

Background High blood pressure (BP) is among significant risk factor for stroke and other vascular occurrences, it experiences nonstop fluctuations over time as a result of a complex interface among cardiovascular control mechanisms. Large blood pressure variability (BPV) has been proved to be promising in providing potential regulatory mechanisms of the cardiovascular system. Although the previous studies also showed that BPV is associated with increased carotid intima-media thickness (IMT) and plaque, whether the correlation between variability in blood pressure and left common carotid artery-intima-media thickness (LCCA-IMT) is stronger than right common carotid artery-intima-media thickness (RCCA-IMT) remains uncertain in hypertension. Methods We conduct a study (78 hypertensive subjects, aged 28–79) to evaluate the relationship between BPV and carotid intima-media thickness in Shenzhen. The blood pressure was collected using the 24?h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring, and its variability was evaluated using standard deviation (SD), coefficient of variation (CV), and average real variability (ARV) during 24?h, daytime and nighttime. All the IMT measurements are collected by ultrasound. Results As the results showed, 24?h systolic blood pressure variability (SBPV) evaluated by SD and ARV were significantly related to LCCA-IMT (r 1 ?=?0.261, P?=?0.021; r 1 ?=?0.262, P?=?0.021, resp.). For the daytime diastolic blood pressure variability (DBPV), ARV indices were significantly related to LCCA-IMT (r 1 ?=?0.239, P?=?0.035), which differed form BPV evaluated by SD and CV. For the night time, there is no significant correlation between the BPV and IMT. Moreover, for all the subjects, there is no significant correlation between the BPV and RCCA-IMT/number of plaques, whereas, the SD, CV, and ARV of daytime SBP showed a positive correlation with LCCA-IMT (r 1 ?=?0.312, P?=?0.005; r 1 ?=?0.255, P?=?0.024; r 1 ?=?0.284, P?=?0.012, resp.). Moreover, the ARV of daytime SBPV, 24?h SBPV and nighttime DBPV showed a positive correlation with the number of plaques of LCCA (r 1 ?=?0.356, P?=?0.008; r 1 ?=?0.297, P?=?0.027; r 1 ?=?0.278, P?=?0.040, resp.). In addition, the number of plaques in LCCA had higher correlation with pulse pressure and diastolic blood pressure than that in RCCA. And multiple regression analysis indicated LCCA-IMT might not only be influenced by age or smoking but also by the SD index of daytime SBPV (p?=?0.035). Conclusions The results show that SBPV during daytime and 24?h had significant correlation with IMT, for the hypertensive subjects from the southern area of China. Moreover, we also found the daytime SBPV to be the best predictor for the progression of IMT in multivariate regression analysis. In addition, the present study suggests that the correlation between BPV and left common carotid artery—intima-media thickness/number of plaques is stronger than right common carotid artery-intima-media thickness/number of plaques.
机译:背景技术高血压(BP)是中风和其他血管出现的显着风险因素,由于心血管控制机制中的复杂界面,它会随着时间的推移而经历不间断的波动。已证明大型血压变异性(BPV)在提供心血管系统的潜在调节机制方面有望。虽然之前的研究还表明,BPV与颈动脉内膜厚度(IMT)和斑块有关,但是否血压变异性与颈动脉 - 内膜介质厚度(LCCA-IMT)之间的相关性比右侧常见的颈动脉 - 内部介质厚度(RCCA-IMT)在高血压中仍然不确定。方法采用研究(78名高血压科目,年龄龄28-79岁),以评估深圳的BPV和颈动脉内膜介质厚度的关系。使用24μmabulatory血压监测收集血压,使用标准偏差(SD),变异系数(CV)和24小时,白天和夜间的平均实际变异(ARV)进行可变性。通过超声波收集所有IMT测量。结果表明,通过SD和ARV评估的24μS收缩压变异性(SBPV)与LCCA-IMT(R 1 α=Δ0.261,P≤x≤0.021; r 1 ?=?0.262,p?=?0.021,RESP。)。对于白天舒张压变异性(DBPV),ARV指数与LCCA-IMT(R 1)显着相关(R 1 Δ=Δ0.239,p?= 0.035),其不同的BPV通过SD评估和简历。在夜间,BPV和IMT之间没有显着相关性。此外,对于所有受试者,BPV和RCCA-IMT /斑块之间没有显着的相关性,而Daytime SBP的SD,CV和ARV与LCCA-IMT(R 1的阳性相关性显示?=?0.312,p?= 0.005; r 1 ?= 0.255,p?= 0.024; r 1 ?= 0.284,p ?=?0.012,RESP。)。此外,白天SBPV的ARV,24?H SBPV和夜间DBPV显示出与LCCA的斑块数量的正相关(R 1 ?=?0.356,p?= 0.008; R 1 ?=?0.297,p?= 0.027; r 1 ?= 0.278,p?=?0.040,REAC。)。此外,LCCA中斑块的数量与脉冲压力和舒张压的相关性高于RCCA中的脉冲压力和舒张压。多元回归分析表明LCCA-IMT可能不仅受年龄或吸烟的影响,而且可能是白天SBPV的SD指数(P?= 0.035)。结论结果表明,白天和24次的SBPV与IMT有显着相关,来自中国南部地区的高血压科目。此外,我们还发现白天SBPV成为多元回归分析中IMT进展的最佳预测因子。此外,本研究表明,BPV和左侧常见的颈动脉 - 内胃 - 介质厚度/斑块数量比右颈动脉 - 内膜 - 内膜介质厚度/数量均等。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号