首页> 外文期刊>BMC Infectious Diseases >Gaps between current clinical practice and evidence-based guidelines for treatment and care of older patients with Community Acquired Pneumonia: a descriptive cross-sectional study
【24h】

Gaps between current clinical practice and evidence-based guidelines for treatment and care of older patients with Community Acquired Pneumonia: a descriptive cross-sectional study

机译:当前临床实践与基于循证患者的循证患者的循证准则之间的差距:一个描述性横断面研究

获取原文
       

摘要

BACKGROUND:Community acquired pneumonia (CAP) remains a significant cause of morbidity and in-hospital mortality, and readmission rates are rising for older persons (?65?years). Optimized treatment and nursing care will benefit patients and the health economy. Hence, there is a need to describe gaps between current clinical practice and recommendations in evidence-based guidelines for diagnostic procedures, medical treatment and nursing interventions for older patients with CAP.METHODS:Structured observations, individual ad hoc interviews and audits of patient records were carried out in an emergency department and three medical units. Data were analysed by manifest content analysis and descriptive statistics.RESULTS:Thirty patients (median age 74?years) admitted with CAP and 86 physicians, nurses, physiotherapists were included. The median length of stay (LOS) was 6.5?days, in-hospital mortality was10 and 40.7% were readmitted within one month. The severity assessment tool (CURB-65) was used in 16.7% of the patients, correct antibiotic treatment prescribed for 13.3% and chest radiography (≤6?weeks post-discharge) prescribed for 22.2%. Fluid therapy, nutrition support and mobilisation plans were found to be developed sporadically, and interventions to be performed unsystematically and sparingly. Positive Expiratory Pressure therapy and oral care were the nursing interventions with lowest adherence, ranging from 18.2 to 55.6%.CONCLUSIONS:Adherence to recommendations was low for several central treatment and nursing care interventions for patients with CAP with possible consequences for patients and the use of resources. Thus, there is an urgent need to identify and remove barriers to adherence to recommendations in the neglected areas in view of the potential to improve patient outcomes.
机译:背景:社区获得的肺炎(帽)仍然是发病率和住院死亡率的重要原因,老年人的入院率正在增加(>?65?年)。优化的治疗和护理将使患者和卫生经济受益。因此,需要描述当前临床实践和建议之间的差距,以循证程序的诊断程序,医疗和护理干预措施的基于诊断程序,医疗和护理干预措施。方法:结构化观察,个人特设访谈和患者记录的审计在急诊部门和三个医疗单位进行。通过清单内容分析和描述性统计分析数据。结果:包括第三十四名患者(中位数74岁?年),包括帽和86名医生,护士,物理治疗师。住院长度(LOS)为6.5?天,住院死亡率为10岁,40.7%在一个月内被预约。在16.7%的患者中使用了严重程度评估工具(Curb-65),正确的抗生素处理为13.3%,胸部射线照相(≤6≤P≤6?出院后排出)规定,规定了22.2%。发现流体疗法,营养支持和动员计划偶尔开发,并不系统地和谨慎地进行干预措施。正呼气压力疗法和口腔护理是依从性最低的护理干预措施,从18.2%到55.6%。结论:对于患有患者可能后果的患者和使用的患者的患者,遵守建议的依从性和护理干预措施较低资源。因此,迫切需要识别和去除障碍,以鉴于改善患者结果的可能性,遵守被忽视的区域中的建议。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号