首页> 外文期刊>BMC Anesthesiology >No correlation between minimal electrical charge at the tip of the stimulating catheter and the efficacy of the peripheral nerve block catheter for brachial plexus block: a prospective blinded cohort study
【24h】

No correlation between minimal electrical charge at the tip of the stimulating catheter and the efficacy of the peripheral nerve block catheter for brachial plexus block: a prospective blinded cohort study

机译:在刺激导管尖端的最小电荷与臂丛丛块的外周神经块导管的功效之间没有相关性:一项潜在的盲队的队列研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Stimulating catheters offer the possibility of delivering an electrical charge via the tip of the catheter. This may be advantageous as it allows verifying if the catheter tip is in close proximity to the target nerve, thereby increasing catheter performance. This prospective blinded cohort study was designed to investigate whether there is a correlation between the minimal electrical charge at the tip of the stimulating catheter, and the efficacy of the peripheral nerve block (PNB) catheter as determined by 24?h postoperative morphine consumption. Methods Forty adult patients with ASA physical health classification I-III scheduled for upper extremity surgery under combined continuous interscalene block and general anesthesia were studied. Six patients were excluded from analysis. After inserting a stimulating catheter as if it were a non-stimulating catheter for 2–5?cm through the needle, the minimal electrical charge necessary to obtain an appropriate motor response was determined. A loading dose of 20 mL ropivacaine 0.75% ropivacaine was then administered, and postoperative analgesia was provided by a continuous infusion of ropivacaine 0.2% 8?mL.h-1 via the brachial plexus catheter, and an intravenous morphine patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) device. Main outcome measures include the minimal electrical charge (MEC) at the tip of the stimulating catheter necessary to elicit an appropriate motor response, and the efficacy of the PNB catheter as determined by 24?h postoperative PCA morphine consumption. Results Mean (SD) [range] MEC at the tip of the stimulating catheter was 589 (1414) [30 – 5000] nC. Mean (SD) [range] 24?h morphine consumption was 8.9 (9.9) [0–29] mg. The correlation between the MEC and 24?h postoperative morphine consumption was Spearman’s Rho rs?=?-0.26, 95% CI -0.56 to 0.09. Conclusion We conclude that there is no proportional relation between MEC at the tip of the blindly inserted stimulating catheter and 24?h postoperative morphine consumption. Trial registration Trialregister.nl identifier: NTR2328
机译:背景技术刺激导管提供了通过导管尖端输送电荷的可能性。这可能是有利的,因为它允许验证导管尖端是否紧邻目标神经,从而增加导管性能。该预期盲队队列研究设计用于研究刺激导管尖端的最小电荷与周围神经嵌段(PNB)导管的功效是否存在相关性,如术后24Ω·H术后吗啡消费所确定的。方法研究了四十例成年患者ASA物理健康分类I-III术治疗连续间隙组合的上肢手术和全身麻醉。六名患者被排除在分析之外。在插入刺激导管后,在通过针的非刺激导管是2-5Ωcm的非刺激导管之后,确定获得适当的电动机响应所需的最小电荷。然后给予20ml罗哌港0.75%罗哌卡因的装载剂量,通过臂丛丛导管连续输注罗哌瓦氏酸0.2%8 -1mL.h -1-sup>,并静脉内缩减术后镇痛吗啡患者控制镇痛(PCA)装置。主要结果测量包括刺激导管尖端的最小电荷(MEC),以引发适当的电动机响应,以及PNB导管的功效,如24μm术后PCA吗啡消费所确定的。结果刺激导管尖端的平均值(SD)[范围] MEC为589(1414)[30-5000] Nc。平均值(SD)[范围] 24?H吗啡消耗为8.9(9.9)[0-29] mg。 MEC和24次术后吗啡消费的相关性是Spearman的rho R s ?=? - 0.26,95%CI -0.56至0.09。结论我们得出结论,MEC在盲目插入的刺激导管尖端之间没有比例关系,24〜H术后吗啡消费。试用注册trialRegister.nl标识符:ntr2328

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号