首页> 外文期刊>BMC Health Services Research >Digital technology and nursing care: a?scoping review on acceptance, effectiveness and efficiency studies of informal and formal care technologies
【24h】

Digital technology and nursing care: a?scoping review on acceptance, effectiveness and efficiency studies of informal and formal care technologies

机译:数字技术和护理:A?审查非正式护理技术的验收,有效性和效率研究

获取原文
           

摘要

The existence, usage and benefits of digital technologies in nursing care are relevant topics in the light of the current discussion on technologies as possible solutions to problems such as the shortage of skilled workers and the increasing demand for long-term care. A lack of good empirical overviews of existing technologies in the present literature prompted us to conduct this review. Its purpose was to map the field of digital technologies for informal and formal care that have already been explored in terms of acceptance, effectiveness and efficiency (AEE), and to show the scope of the used methods, target settings, target groups and fields of support. A systematic literature search was conducted using Medline, Scopus, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, ACM Digital Library, IEEE Xplore, the Collection of Computer Science Bibliographies, GeroLit and CareLit. In addition, project websites were manually screened for relevant publications. Seven hundred fifteen papers were included in the review. Effectiveness studies have been most frequently performed for ICT, robots and sensors. Acceptance studies often focussed on ICT, robots and EHR/EMR. Efficiency studies were generally rare. Many studies were found to have a low level of evidence. Experimental designs with small numbers and without control groups were the most common methods used to evaluate acceptance and effectiveness. Study designs with high evidence levels were most commonly found for ICT, robots and e-learning. Technologies evaluated for informal caregivers and children or indicated for formal care at home or in cross-sectoral care were rare. We recommend producing high-quality evaluations on existing digital technologies for AEE in real-life settings rather than systematic reviews with low-quality studies. More focus should be placed on research into efficiency. Future research should be devoted to a closer examination of the applied AEE evaluation methods. Policymakers should provide funding to enable large-scale, long-term evaluations of technologies in the practice of care, filling the research gaps for technologies, target settings and target groups identified in this review.
机译:鉴于目前对技术缺乏技术的问题以及对长期护理的不断增加的问题,鉴于目前对技术的解决方案以及对长期护理的不断增加的问题的解决方案,数字技术在护理中的存在性,使用和益处是相关主题。目前文学中现有技术缺乏良好的实证概述促使我们进行这一审查。其目的是映射在接受,有效性和效率(AEE)方面已经探讨的非正式和正式护理的数字技术领域,并展示了使用的方法,目标设置,目标组和字段的范围支持。使用Medline,Scopus,Cinahl,Cochrane图书馆,ACM数字图书馆,IEEE XPLORE,计算机科学博士,Gerolit和Carelit的集合进行了系统的文献搜索。此外,项目网站被手动筛选出相关的出版物。审查中包含七百五十篇论文。对于ICT,机器人和传感器来说,最常进行有效性研究。验收研究通常集中在ICT,机器人和EHR / EMR上。效率研究通常很少见。发现许多研究具有较低的证据。具有较少数量和没有对照组的实验设计是用于评估验收和有效性的最常见方法。最常见于ICT,机器人和电子学习的高证据水平的研究设计。为非正式护理人员和儿童评估的技术或在家中的正式护理或跨部门护理表明是罕见的。我们建议在现实生活中的AEE中对现有数字技术进行高质量的评估,而不是具有低质量研究的系统性评论。应在研究效率方面进行更多的重点。将来应致力于接近应用AEE评估方法的仔细考察。政策制定者应提供资金,以便在护理的实践中实现大规模,长期评估技术,填补了本次审查中确定的技术,目标设置和目标群体的研究差距。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号