...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Health Services Research >Applying the Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) approach to a large pragmatic study involving safety net clinics
【24h】

Applying the Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) approach to a large pragmatic study involving safety net clinics

机译:应用计划实践法(PDSA)涉及安全网诊所的大型务实研究

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background The Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycle is a commonly used improvement process in health care settings, although its documented use in pragmatic clinical research is rare. A recent pragmatic clinical research study, called the Strategies and Opportunities to STOP Colon Cancer in Priority Populations (STOP CRC), used this process to optimize the research implementation of an automated colon cancer screening outreach program in intervention clinics. We describe the process of using this PDSA approach, the selection of PDSA topics by clinic leaders, and project leaders’ reactions to using PDSA in pragmatic research. Methods STOP CRC is a cluster-randomized pragmatic study that aims to test the effectiveness of a direct-mail fecal immunochemical testing (FIT) program involving eight Federally Qualified Health Centers in Oregon and California. We and a practice improvement specialist trained in the PDSA process delivered structured presentations to leaders of these centers; the presentations addressed how to apply the PDSA process to improve implementation of a mailed outreach program offering colorectal cancer screening through FIT tests. Center leaders submitted PDSA plans and delivered reports via webinar at quarterly meetings of the project’s advisory board. Project staff conducted one-on-one, 45-min interviews with project leads from each health center to assess the reaction to and value of the PDSA process in supporting the implementation of STOP CRC. Results Clinic-selected PDSA activities included refining the intervention staffing model, improving outreach materials, and changing workflow steps. Common benefits of using PDSA cycles in pragmatic research were that it provided a structure for staff to focus on improving the program and it allowed staff to test the change they wanted to see. A commonly reported challenge was measuring the success of the PDSA process with the available electronic medical record tools. Conclusion Understanding how the PDSA process can be applied to pragmatic trials and the reaction of clinic staff to their use may help clinics integrate evidence-based interventions into their everyday care processes. Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov NCT01742065 . Registered October 31, 2013.
机译:背景技术计划实践 - 行动(PDSA)循环是卫生保健环境中常用的改进过程,尽管其在语用临床研究中的文件使用很少见。近期务实的临床研究研究,称为停止结肠癌的策略和机会在优先级群体(停止CRC)中,使用了这一过程,优化了干预诊所中自动结肠癌筛查外展计划的研究。我们描述了使用此PDSA方法的过程,诊所领导人选择PDSA主题,以及在务实的研究中使用PDSA的项目领导者的反应。方法停止CRC是一项集群随机性的务实研究,旨在测试涉及俄勒冈州八个联邦合格的保健中心的直邮粪便免疫化素测试(FIT)计划的有效性。我们和练习改进专家在PDSA过程中培训,将结构化的演示介绍给这些中心的领导者;介绍如何应用PDSA进程,以改善通过FIT测试提供结直肠癌筛查的邮寄外联方案的实施。中心领导人提交了PDSA计划,并通过网络研讨会在项目咨询委员会的季度会议上提供了报告。项目人员一对一,与每个卫生中心的项目导线进行一对一,从每个卫生间的项目提供,评估PDSA过程的反应和价值支持停止CRC的实施。结果诊所所选的PDSA活动包括精制干预人员配置模型,改善外展材料和改变工作流程步骤。使用PDSA周期在务实的研究中的共同益处是它为员工提供了一个结构,专注于改善计划,并且允许员工测试他们想要看到的变化。常见的挑战是测量PDSA过程的成功与可用的电子医疗录制工具。结论了解PDSA过程如何应用于务实试验,诊所员工对其使用的反应可能有助于诊所将基于证据的干预措施整合到日常护理程序中。试验登记ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01742065。注册2013年10月31日。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号