...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC research notes >Reanalysis of the physical and mental health summary scores of dialysis versus conservative care in older patients with advanced chronic kidney disease: a critical appraisal
【24h】

Reanalysis of the physical and mental health summary scores of dialysis versus conservative care in older patients with advanced chronic kidney disease: a critical appraisal

机译:高级慢性肾病患者透析与保守护理的身体和心理健康概要评分:批判性评价

获取原文
           

摘要

Abstract ObjectiveNon-dialytic conservative care is argued to be a reasonable treatment alternative for dialysis in selected older patients with advanced chronic kidney disease. We evaluated patient-relevant outcomes including health-related quality of life in a previous study. However, the scoring algorithm we used to calculate the physical and mental component summary scores of the Short Form-36 (SF-36) turned out to differ from comparable studies on this topic. The aim of this critical appraisal was to reanalyze the SF-36 summary scores in our patient cohort (≥?70?years) using the more widely used scoring algorithm.ResultsPatients on conservative care ( n =?23) had lower physical and mental component summary scores compared to patients not yet started on dialysis ( n =?39), but similar compared to patients on dialysis ( n =?34). These findings were similar to our original findings and did not change the conclusions. Several scoring algorithms are used for the SF-36 summary scores. Researchers should be aware of this fact and should use the same scoring algorithm across similar studies in a specific field to increase comparability. Using the more widely used scoring algorithm, the recalculated SF-36 summary scores of our patient cohort can now be compared to other studies.
机译:摘要对象型 - 透析保守护理是一种合理的治疗依赖于先进的慢性肾病患者透析的替代品。我们评估了患者相关的结果,包括在前一项研究中存在与健康有关的生活质量。然而,我们用于计算短表36(SF-36)的物理和心理组件摘要分数的评分算法结果与对该主题的类似研究不同。这种关键评估的目的是使用更广泛使用的评分算法来重新分析我们的患者队列(≥70?年)中的SF-36摘要分数。保守护理(n =Δ23)的身体和精神组件的患者与透析(n =β39)尚未开始的患者相比,与透析患者相比,摘要得分(n =Δ39)相比这些发现与我们的原始调查结果类似,并没有改变结论。几种评分算法用于SF-36摘要分数。研究人员应该了解这一事实,并且应该在特定领域中使用相同的评分算法在特定领域中以增加可比性。使用更广泛使用的评分算法,现在可以将重新计算的SF-36概要分数与其他研究相比。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号