首页> 外文期刊>BMJ Open Respiratory Research >Laboratory-based Intermountain Validated Exacerbation (LIVE) Score stability in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
【24h】

Laboratory-based Intermountain Validated Exacerbation (LIVE) Score stability in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

机译:基于实验室的间隔验证了慢性阻塞性肺病患者的恶化(Live)得分稳定性

获取原文
           

摘要

Background The Laboratory-based Intermountain Validated Exacerbation (LIVE) Score is associated with mortality and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exacerbation risk across multiple health systems. However, whether the LIVE Score and its associated risk is a stable patient characteristic is unknown.Methods We validated the LIVE Score in a fourth health system. Then we determined the LIVE Score stability in a retrospective cohort of 98?766 patients with COPD in four health systems where it was previously validated. We assessed whether LIVE Scores changed or remained the same over time. Stability was defined as a majority of surviving patients having the same LIVE Score 4?years later.Results The LIVE Score separated patients into three LIVE Score risk groups of low, medium, and high mortality and LIVE Score stability. Mortality ranged from 6.2% for low-risk LIVE to 45.8% for high-risk LIVE (p0.001). We found that low-risk LIVE groups were stable and high-risk LIVE groups were unstable. Low-risk LIVE group patients remained low risk, but few high-risk LIVE group patients remained high risk (79.0% high vs 48.1% medium vs 8.8% low, p0.001 for all pairwise comparisons).Conclusion The LIVE Score identifies three major clinically actionable cohorts: a stable low-risk LIVE group, an unstable high-risk LIVE group with high mortality rates, and a medium-risk LIVE group. These observations further our understanding of how existing data used to calculate the LIVE Score may target interventions across risk cohorts of patients with COPD in a health system.
机译:背景技术基于实验室的国际验证(Live)评分验证了(Live)评分与多个卫生系统中的死亡率和慢性阻塞性肺病(COPD)加剧风险有关。但是,是否比分比分及其相关的风险是稳定的患者特征。我们验证了第四卫生系统的比分。然后,我们确定了98个卫生系统中的98岁的回顾队列中的比分稳定性,以前的四个卫生系统。我们评估了是否随着时间的推移改变或保持不变。稳定性被定义为大多数幸存的患者,患有相同的比分4年后。几年后。结果将患者分为三个现场比分风险群,低,中,高死亡率和比分稳定性。低风险的死亡率为6.2%,高风险活力为45.8%(P <0.001)。我们发现低风险的活群是稳定的,高风险的现场团体不稳定。低风险的活群患者风险低,但很少有高风险的活群患者风险较高(79.0%高与48.1%培养基与8.8%低,P <0.001用于所有成对比较)。结论实时评分识别三个主要临床可行的队列:一个稳定的低风险实况集团,一个不稳定的高风险实时组,具有高死亡率,以及中等风险的现场集团。这些观察结果进一步了解用于计算实时评分的现有数据如何在卫生系统中患有COPD患者的风险队列的干预措施。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号