首页> 外文期刊>Beijing Law Review >Water Pollutants Discharge Permit Systems of the United States and China: A Comparison Using Referential Method
【24h】

Water Pollutants Discharge Permit Systems of the United States and China: A Comparison Using Referential Method

机译:水污染物排放许可证系统和中国:使用参照方法进行比较

获取原文
       

摘要

Using a referential method, a comparative study is carried out on the USA Clean Water Act (CWA) and the PRC Water Pollution Prevention and Control Law (WPPCL). Both laws employ a discharge permit system to achieve their respective environmental goals. The focus of the study is on the comparison of the CWA/National Pollutants Discharge Elimination System and the WPPCL/Water Pollution Discharge Permit system. It is first pointed out that the comparison of environmental laws is not a “better-law comparison”. Instead, an environmental law in one country may be used as reference to examine how an environmental law in another country can be developed and implemented within the respective legal framework. Comparison between the USA CWA/NPDES and the PRC WPPCL/WPDP is made from the perspectives of law objectives, implementation procedures and enforcement actions. Several recommendations are then made to better design and implement the permit system in China, with respect to ethical premise, concrete law, discharge standards and enforcement.
机译:使用参照方法,对比较研究进行了对比较研究,对美国清洁水法(CWA)和中国水污染防治法(WPPCL)进行。两项法律都雇用了排放许可制度,以实现各自的环境目标。该研究的重点是对CWA /国家污染物排放消除系统和WPPCL /水污染排放许可证制度的比较。首先指出,环境法的比较不是“更好的法律比较”。相反,一个国家的环境法可以用作参考,以检查其他国家的环境法如何在各自的法律框架内制定和实施。美国CWA / NPDES与中国WPPCL / WPDP之间的比较是由法律目标,实施程序和执法行动的观点进行的。随后,若干建议将更好地设计和实施中国的许可证制度,关于道德前提,具体法律,排放标准和执法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号