...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Gastroenterology >Comparison of overall survival on surgical resection versus transarterial chemoembolization with or without radiofrequency ablation in intermediate stage hepatocellular carcinoma: a propensity score matching analysis
【24h】

Comparison of overall survival on surgical resection versus transarterial chemoembolization with or without radiofrequency ablation in intermediate stage hepatocellular carcinoma: a propensity score matching analysis

机译:手术切除整体存活的比较与中间阶段肝细胞癌的rylterial Chemobolization,术后肝细胞癌:倾向得分匹配分析

获取原文
           

摘要

Patients with Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage B hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) are recommended to undergo transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE). However, TACE in combination with radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is not inferior to surgical resection (SR), and the benefits of surgical resection (SR) for BCLC stage B HCC remain unclear. Hence, this study aims to compare the impact of SR, TACE+RFA, and TACE on analyzing overall survival (OS) in BCLC stage B HCC. Overall, 428 HCC patients were included in BCLC stage B, and their clinical data and OS were recorded. OS was analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression analysis. One hundred forty (32.7%) patients received SR, 57 (13.3%) received TACE+RFA, and 231 (53.9%) received TACE. The OS was significantly higher in the SR group than that in the TACE+RFA group [hazard ratio (HR): 1.78; 95% confidence incidence (CI): 1.15–2.75, p?=?0.009]. The OS was significantly higher in the SR group than that in the TACE group (HR: 3.17; 95% CI: 2.31–4.36, p??0.0001). Moreover, the OS was significantly higher in the TACE+RFA group than that in the TACE group (HR: 1.82; 95% CI: 1.21–2.74, p?=?0.004). The cumulative OS rates at 1, 3 and 5?years in the SR, TACE+RFA, and TACE groups were 89.2, 69.4 and 61.2%, 86.0, 57.9 and 38.2%, and 69.5, 37.0 and 15.2%, respectively. After propensity score matching, the SR group still had a higher OS than those of the TACE+RFA and TACE groups. The TACE+RFA group had a higher OS than that of the TACE group. The SR group had higher OS than the TACE+RFA and TACE groups in BCLC stage B HCC. Furthermore, the TACE+RFA group had higher OS than the TACE group.
机译:患有巴塞罗那临床肝癌(BCLC)第B阶段B肝细胞癌(HCC)的患者被建议经过转截管动脉化疗栓塞(TACE)。然而,与射频消融(RFA)结合的TACE不逊于外科切除(SR),并且手术切除(SR)对BCLC阶段B HCC的益处仍不清楚。因此,本研究旨在比较SR,TACE + RFA和TACE对BCLC阶段B HCC中整体存活(OS)的影响。总体而言,428例HCC患者包含在BCLC阶段B中,并记录其临床数据和操作系统。通过Kaplan-Meier方法和Cox回归分析分析了OS。百分之百(32.7%)患者接受SR,57例(13.3%)接受TACE + RFA,231名(53.9%)收到的TACE。 SR组在TACE + RFA组中的OS显着高于[危险比(HR):1.78; 95%置信度(CI):1.15-2.75,p?= 0.009]。 SR组中的OS显着高于TACE组(HR:3.17; 95%CI:2.31-4.36,P?<0.0001)。此外,TACE + RFA组在TACE组中显着越来越高(HR:1.82; 95%CI:1.21-2.74,P?= 0.004)。 SR,TACE + RFA和TACE组的1,3和5岁的累积OS率分别为89.2,69.4和61.2%,86.0,57.9和38.2%,分别为69.5,37.0和15.2%。经过倾销得分匹配后,SR组仍然比TACE + RFA和TACE组的OS更高。 TACE + RFA组具有比TACE组更高的操作系统。 SR组具有比BCLC阶段B HCC的TACE + RFA和TACE组更高的操作系统。此外,TACE + RFA组具有比TACE组更高的OS。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号