首页> 外文期刊>BMC Family Practice >Analysis on professional identity and related factors among Chinese general practitioners: a National Cross-sectional Study
【24h】

Analysis on professional identity and related factors among Chinese general practitioners: a National Cross-sectional Study

机译:中国全科医生专业认同与相关因素分析:国家横断面研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Studies on professional identity and related factors among Chinese general practitioners (GPs) are unavailable. The objective of this study was to investigate the professional identity level of GPs in China and explore factors associated with GPs’ perceptions of their professional identity. A multistage stratified random sampling method was used to collect data with a structured self-administered questionnaire from 3236 GPs working in community health service institutions (CHIs) in China between October, 2017 and February, 2018. Professional identity was measured by the 13 items scale. Descriptive statistics were calculated and groups’ differences were estimated using nonparametric tests. Multiple linear stepwise regression analysis was used to analyze factors associated with professional identity among GPs. Based on a total score of 65 on the professional identity scale, the average score for GPs’ professional identity was 51.23 (SD?=?6.56). Multiple linear stepwise regression analysis showed that GPs who practiced in Central China, with an administrative responsibility, at a moderate or higher income level, who frequently worked overtime, had more occupational development opportunities, with a higher level of job satisfaction and older GPs had higher levels of professional identity. Professional identity level among GPs in China is high. Region, administrative responsibility, income level, working overtime, occupational development opportunities, age, and job satisfaction were significant predictors of professional identity.
机译:中国全科医生(GPS)中的专业身份和相关因素的研究是不可用的。本研究的目的是调查中国GPS的专业身份水平,并探讨与GPS对其专业身份的看法相关的因素。多级分层随机采样方法用于收集来自2017年和2018年2月在中国的社区卫生服务机构(CHI)工作的3236 GPS结构化自我管理问卷的数据。专业身份通过13项规模衡量。使用非参数测试计算描述性统计数据并估计群体的差异。多线性逐步回归分析用于分析GPS之间与专业身份相关的因素。基于专业身份规模的总分65,GPS专业身份的平均分数为51.23(SD?=?6.56)。多线性逐步回归分析表明,在中国中部练习的GPS,行政责任,经常工作加班的中等或更高的收入水平,具有更高的职业发展机会,具有更高水平的工作满意度和较老的GPS具有更高的工作专业身份的水平。中国GPS中的专业身份水平很高。地区,行政责任,收入水平,加班费,职业发展机会,年龄和工作满意度是专业认同的重要预测因素。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号