...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Emergency Medicine >Evaluating capacity at three government referral hospital emergency units in the kingdom of Eswatini using the WHO Hospital Emergency Unit Assessment Tool
【24h】

Evaluating capacity at three government referral hospital emergency units in the kingdom of Eswatini using the WHO Hospital Emergency Unit Assessment Tool

机译:利用世界院医院应急单位评估工具评估埃斯瓦蒂尼王国的三个政府推荐医院紧急单位的能力

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The Kingdom of Eswatini, a lower-middle income nation of 1.45 million in southern Africa, has recently identified emergency care as a key strategy to respond to the national disease burden. We aimed to evaluate the current capacity of hospital emergency care areas using the WHO Hospital Emergency Unit Assessment Tool (HEAT) at government referral hospitals in Eswatini. We conducted a cross-sectional study of three government referral hospital emergency care areas using HEAT in May 2018. This standardised tool assists healthcare facilities to assess the emergency care delivery capacity in facilities and support in identifying gaps and targeting interventions to strengthen care delivery within emergency care areas. Senior-level emergency care area employees, including senior medical officers and nurse matrons, were interviewed using the HEAT. All sites provided some level of emergency care 24?h a day, 7 days a week, though most had multiple entry points for emergency care. Only one facility had a dedicated area for receiving emergencies and a dedicated resuscitation area; two had triage areas. Facilities had limited capacity to perform signal functions (life-saving procedures that require both skills and resources). Commonly reported barriers included training deficits and lack of access to supplies, medications, and equipment. Sites also lacked formal clinical management and process protocols (such as triage and clinical protocols). The HEAT highlighted strengths and weaknesses of emergency care delivery within hospitals in Eswatini and identified specific causes of these system and service gaps. In order to improve emergency care outcomes, multiple interventions are needed, including training opportunities, improvement in supply chains, and implementation of clinical and process protocols for emergency care areas. We hope that these findings will allow hospital administrators and planners to develop effective change management plans.
机译:Eswatini王国,南部非洲中低收入国家,145万,最近将紧急护理确定为应对国家疾病负担的关键战略。我们的旨在评估医院应急护理地区的当前医院应急单元评估工具(热)在Eswatini的政府推荐医院。我们在2018年5月使用热量进行了对三个政府转诊医院应急护理地区的横断面研究。该标准化工具有助于医疗保健设施,评估设施的紧急护理能力和识别差距和瞄准干预措施,以加强紧急情况下的护理送货护理地区。高级应急护理区员工,包括高级医疗官员和护士矩阵,采用热量采访。所有网站每周7天提供一定程度的紧急护理24?H,尽管大多数有多次应急护理的入口点。只有一个设施有一个专门的接收紧急情况和专用复苏区域的地区;两个有分流区域。设施能够执行信号功能的容量有限(需要技能和资源的救生程序)。通常报告的障碍包括培训赤字和缺乏对供应,药物和设备的访问。网站也缺乏正式的临床管理和过程协议(如分类和临床协议)。热量突出了埃斯瓦蒂尼医院内应急护理的优势和弱点,并确定了这些系统和服务差距的特定原因。为了改善紧急护理结果,需要多种干预措施,包括培训机会,供应链的改进,以及临床和急诊护理地区的过程协议。我们希望这些调查结果允许医院管理人员和规划人员制定有效的变革管理计划。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号