首页> 外文期刊>BMC Palliative Care >The desire to die in palliative care: a sequential mixed methods study to develop a semi-structured clinical approach
【24h】

The desire to die in palliative care: a sequential mixed methods study to develop a semi-structured clinical approach

机译:在姑息治疗中死亡的愿望:一种连续的混合方法,开发半结构化临床方法

获取原文
       

摘要

Although desire to die of varying intensity and permanence is frequent in patients receiving palliative care, uncertainty exists concerning appropriate therapeutic responses to it. To support health professionals in dealing with patients′ potential desire to die, a training program and a semi-structured clinical approach was developed. This study aimed for a revision of and consensus building on the clinical approach to support proactively addressing desire to die and routine exploration of death and dying distress. Within a sequential mixed methods design, we invited 16 palliative patients to participate in semi-structured interviews and 377 (inter-)national experts to attend a two-round Delphi process. Interviews were analyzed using qualitative content analysis and an agreement consensus for the Delphi was determined according to predefined criteria. 11 (69%) patients from different settings participated in face-to-face interviews. As key issues for conversations on desire to die they pointed out the relationship between professionals and patients, the setting and support from external experts, if required. A set of 149 (40%) experts (132/89% from Germany, 17/11% from 9 other countries) evaluated ten domains of the semi-structured clinical approach. There was immediate consensus on nine domains concerning conversation design, suggestions for (self-)reflection, and further recommended action. The one domain in which consensus was not achieved until the second round was “proactively addressing desire to die”. We have provided the first semi-structured clinical approach to identify and address desire to die and to respond therapeutically – based on evidence, patients’ views and consensus among professional experts. The study is registered in the German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS00012988; registration date: 27.9.2017) and in the Health Services Research Database (VfD_DEDIPOM_17_003889; registration date: 14.9.2017).
机译:虽然在接受姑息治疗的患者中常常死于不同强度和持久性的愿望,但存在对其的适当治疗反应存在不确定性。为了支持患者潜在的死亡潜力,培训计划和半结构化临床方法的支持卫生专业人员。本研究旨在修改和共识建立临床方法,以支持积极解决死亡和常规探索死亡和死亡遇险的渴望。在序贯混合方法设计中,我们邀请了16名姑息患者参加了半结构化访谈和377(国际国际专家专家,参加了两轮德尔福进程。使用定性内容分析分析访谈,并根据预定标准确定德尔福协商一致意见。 11(69%)来自不同环境的患者参加了面对面的访谈。作为对愿望的关键问题,他们指出了专业人士和患者之间的关系,如果需要,外部专家的环境和支持。一套149(40%)专家(德国132/89%,来自9个其他国家的17/11%)评估了半结构化临床方法的十个领域。关于九个域名有关会话设计的立即共识,(自我)反思的建议以及进一步推荐的行动。在第二轮之前没有实现共识的一个领域是“积极解决死亡欲望”。我们提供了第一种半结构化的临床方法来识别和解决死亡欲望,并根据专业专家之间的证据,患者的观点和共识来响应治疗性。该研究在德国临床试验登记册中注册(DRKS00012988;注册日期:27.9.2017)和卫生服务研究数据库(VFD_DEDIPOM_17_003889;注册日期:14.9.2017)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号