首页> 外文期刊>Birdem Medical Journal >Comparison of laparoscopic appendectomy versus open appendectomy in acute appendicitis in obese diabetic patients
【24h】

Comparison of laparoscopic appendectomy versus open appendectomy in acute appendicitis in obese diabetic patients

机译:腹腔镜阑尾切除术与开放阑尾切除术在肥胖糖尿病患者中急性阑尾炎的比较

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: Acute appendicitis (AC) is a common surgical problem requiring emergency hospitalization for urgent appendectomy. In case of diabetic patients, the incidence of developing acute appendicitis including its complications like abscess, gangrene and perforation is higher than non-diabetic. Day by day, laparoscopic appendectomy is having an improved outcome in non-diabetic and non-obese patients. The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of laparoscopic appendectomy versus open appendectomy in acute appendicitis of obese diabetic patients.Methods: A comparative study was carried out in a tertiary care hospital in Dhaka City. Hospitalized obese diabetic patients with a diagnosis of acute appendicitis, who underwent appendectomy, were considered as study population. Obesity was defined as body mass index (BMI) greater than 30 kg/m2 according to World Health Organization and American Obesity Association guidelines. Patients were divided into two groups according to type of appendectomy; 50 patients by laparoscopic appendectomy as group LA and 50 patients by open appendectomy as group OA.Results: Most patients were obese I (30.0-34.9 kg/m2) in group LA and OA (92.0% and 86.0%, respectively, p0.05). Uncontrolled diabetes mellitus was detected in most of the patients of both group LA (96.0%) and OA (98.0%). Mean operation time, mean duration of post-operation ileus, mean hospital stay and post-operation complications were less in group LA than group OA which is statistically significant (p 0.05). No patient developed wound infection after laparoscopic appendectomy; whereas, 8.0% patients had wound infection in open appendectomy (p0.05).Conclusion: In this study, laparoscopic appendectomy had good outcome over its open counterpart regarding shorter operating time, hospital stay, less wound infection, postoperative pain and time to return to usual activities.
机译:背景:急性阑尾炎(AC)是需要紧急住院治疗紧急阑尾切除术的常见手术问题。在糖尿病患者的情况下,发育急性阑尾炎的发生率,包括其并发症,如脓肿,坏疽和穿孔等于非糖尿病。日复一日,腹腔镜阑尾切除术在非糖尿病和非肥胖患者中具有改善的结果。本研究的目的是比较腹腔镜阑尾切除术的结果与肥胖糖尿病患者急性阑尾炎的开放阑尾切除术。方法:在达卡市的第三级护理医院进行了比较研究。住院肥胖糖尿病患者诊断急性阑尾炎的急性阑尾炎,被视为研究人群。根据世界卫生组织和美国肥胖协会指南,肥胖定义为大于30公斤/平方米的体重指数(BMI)。根据阑尾切除术的类型分为两组; 50例腹腔镜阑尾切除术为群组和50名患者,开放阑尾切除术为组。结果:大多数患者在La和OA组中肥胖I(30.0-34.9 kg / m 2)(分别为92.0%和86.0%,p 0.05 )。在La(96.0%)和OA(98.0%)的大多数患者中检测到不受控制的糖尿病。平均手术时间,术后持续时间的平均持续时间Ileus,平均医院住宿和后手术后并发症比统计学意义(PLT; 0.05)的群体少于组。腹腔镜阑尾切除术后没有患者发育伤口感染;然而,8.0%患者在开放的阑尾切除术(PLT; 0.05)中有伤口感染(PLT; 0.05)。结论:在本研究中,腹腔镜阑尾切除术对其开放式对手的良好结果,关于更短的操作时间,住院,较少的伤口感染,术后疼痛和时间恢复通常的活动。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号