...
首页> 外文期刊>Critical care : >Diagnostic accuracy of C-reactive protein and procalcitonin in suspected community-acquired pneumonia adults visiting emergency department and having a systematic thoracic CT scan
【24h】

Diagnostic accuracy of C-reactive protein and procalcitonin in suspected community-acquired pneumonia adults visiting emergency department and having a systematic thoracic CT scan

机译:C-反应蛋白和ProCalcitonin在疑似群岛肺炎的诊断准确性访问急诊部,具有系统胸段CT扫描

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

IntroductionCommunity-acquired pneumonia (CAP) requires prompt treatment, but its diagnosis is complex. Improvement of bacterial CAP diagnosis by biomarkers has been evaluated using chest X-ray infiltrate as the CAP gold standard, producing conflicting results. We analyzed the diagnostic accuracy of biomarkers in suspected CAP adults visiting emergency departments for whom CAP diagnosis was established by an adjudication committee which founded its judgment on a systematic multidetector thoracic CT scan.MethodsIn an ancillary study of a multi-center prospective study evaluating the impact of systematic thoracic CT scan on CAP diagnosis, sensitivity and specificity of C-reactive protein (CRP) and procalcitonin (PCT) were evaluated. Systematic nasopharyngeal multiplex respiratory virus PCR was performed at inclusion. An adjudication committee classified CAP diagnostic probability on a 4-level Likert scale, based on all available data.ResultsTwo hundred patients with suspected CAP were analyzed. The adjudication committee classified 98 patients (49.0?%) as definite CAP, 8 (4.0?%) as probable, 23 (11.5?%) as possible and excluded in 71 (35.5?%, including 29 patients with pulmonary infiltrates on chest X-ray). Among patients with radiological pulmonary infiltrate, 23?% were finally classified as excluded. Viruses were identified by PCR in 29?% of patients classified as definite. Area under the curve was 0.787 [95?% confidence interval (95?% CI), 0.717 to 0.857] for CRP and 0.655 (95?% CI, 0.570 to 0.739) for PCT to detect definite CAP. CRP threshold at 50?mg/L resulted in a positive predictive value of 0.76 and a negative predictive value of 0.75. No PCT cut-off resulted in satisfactory positive or negative predictive values. CRP and PCT accuracy was not improved by exclusion of the 25 (25.5?%) definite viral CAP cases.ConclusionsFor patients with suspected CAP visiting emergency departments, diagnostic accuracy of CRP and PCT are insufficient to confirm the CAP diagnosis established using a gold standard that includes thoracic CT scan. Diagnostic accuracy of these biomarkers is also insufficient to distinguish bacterial CAP from viral CAP.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov registry NCT01574066 (February 7, 2012)Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13054-015-1083-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
机译:介绍社区获得的肺炎(上限)需要及时治疗,但其诊断是复杂的。使用胸X射线浸润作为帽金标准的胸部X射线渗透来评估生物标志物的细菌帽诊断的改善,产生相互矛盾的结果。我们分析了疑似章程成人中生物标志物的诊断准确性访问审判委员会的审判委员会的呼应部门,该审判委员会建立了对系统多票胸部CT Scan的判断。方法对评估影响的多中心前瞻性研究的辅助研究评价系统胸腔CT扫描关于C-反应蛋白(CRP)和ProCalcitonin(PCT)的敏感性和特异性。系统鼻咽多重呼吸道病毒PCR在夹杂物中进行。根据所有可用的数据,审判委员会对4级李克特量表的诊断概率分类。分析了疑似帽的一百患者。裁决委员会将98名患者(49.0μm)分类为明确的帽,8(4.0μm),如可能的,23(11.5倍),在71(35.5倍)中排除(包括29名胸部肺渗透患者-射线)。在放射肺浸润的患者中,最终归类为排除23μl%。通过PCR鉴定病毒在29岁以下的患者中鉴定为明确的患者。曲线下的面积为0.787 [95〜%CI),CRP和0.655(95〜%CI,0.570至0.739)的PCT检测确定的帽。 CRP阈值50?Mg / L导致阳性预测值为0.76,负预测值为0.75。没有PCT截止导致令人满意的正或负预测值。 CRP和PCT精度排除25(25.5倍)明确的病毒帽案例没有得到改善。对于涉嫌上限的患者,访问应急部门的患者,CRP和PCT的诊断准确性不足以确认使用黄金标准建立的帽诊断包括胸部CT扫描。这些生物标志物的诊断准确性也不足以区分病毒帽的细菌帽.TiaN resignclinictrials.gov登记处NCT01574066(2012年2月7日)电子补充材料本文的在线版本(DOI:10.1186 / s13054-015-1083-6)包含补充材料,可供授权用户使用。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号