...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Public Health >Incentive payments to general practitioners aimed at increasing opportunistic testing of young women for chlamydia: a pilot cluster randomised controlled trial
【24h】

Incentive payments to general practitioners aimed at increasing opportunistic testing of young women for chlamydia: a pilot cluster randomised controlled trial

机译:旨在为旨在增加对衣原体的少妇的机会主义测试的奖励支付:试点集群随机对照试验

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Financial incentives have been used for many years internationally to improve quality of care in general practice. The aim of this pilot study was to determine if offering general practitioners (GP) a small incentive payment per test would increase chlamydia testing in women aged 16 to 24 years, attending general practice. Methods General practice clinics (n = 12) across Victoria, Australia, were cluster randomized to receive either a $AUD5 payment per chlamydia test or no payment for testing 16 to 24 year old women for chlamydia. Data were collected on the number of chlamydia tests and patient consultations undertaken by each GP over two time periods: 12 month pre-trial and 6 month trial period. The impact of the intervention was assessed using a mixed effects logistic regression model, accommodating for clustering at GP level. Results Testing increased from 6.2% (95% CI: 4.2, 8.4) to 8.8% (95% CI: 4.8, 13.0) (p = 0.1) in the control group and from 11.5% (95% CI: 4.6, 18.5) to 13.4% (95% CI: 9.5, 17.5) (p = 0.4) in the intervention group. Overall, the intervention did not result in a significant increase in chlamydia testing in general practice. The odds ratio for an increase in testing in the intervention group compared to the control group was 0.9 (95% CI: 0.6, 1.2). Major barriers to increased chlamydia testing reported by GPs included a lack of time, difficulty in remembering to offer testing and a lack of patient awareness around testing. Conclusions A small financial incentive alone did not increase chlamydia testing among young women attending general practice. It is possible small incentive payments in conjunction with reminder and feedback systems may be effective, as may higher financial incentive payments. Further research is required to determine if financial incentives can increase testing in Australian general practice, the type and level of financial scheme required and whether incentives needs to be part of a multi-faceted package. Trial Registration Australian New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry ACTRN12608000499381.
机译:背景技术金融激励已在国际上使用多年来提高一般惯例的护理质量。该试点研究的目的是确定提供全科医生(GP)每次测试的小型激励支付是否会增加16至24岁的女性的衣原体测试,参加一般做法。方法对澳大利亚维多利亚的一般实践诊所(n = 12)是随机的,随机接受每次衣原体测试或无需支付16至24岁女性的衣原体的支付。每次GP的衣原体测试和患者磋商的数量收集数据超过两次时间:12个月的试验和6个月试用期。使用混合效应逻辑回归模型评估干预的影响,适应在GP水平上进行聚类。结果检测从对照组的6.2%(95%CI:4.2,8.4)增加到8.8%(95%CI:4.8,13.0)(P = 0.1),11.5%(95%CI:4.6,18.5)。干预组中的13.4%(95%CI:9.5,17.5)(P = 0.4)。总体而言,干预措施并未导致衣原体在一般实践中的显着增加。与对照组相比,干预组在干预组中增加的差距为0.9(95%CI:0.6,1.2)。 GPS报告的衣原体检测的主要障碍包括缺乏时间,难以记住测试和缺乏患者在测试中的意识。结论单独的小型财务激励并未增加参加一般惯例的年轻女性中的衣原体测试。与提醒和反馈系统相结合的可能小型激励支付可能是有效的,这可能是更高的财务激励支付。需要进一步的研究来确定金融激励是否可以增加澳大利亚一般实践的测试,所需的财务计划的类型和水平以及奖励是否需要成为多方面包的一部分。试验登记澳大利亚新西兰临床试验登记法ACRRN12608000499381

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号